ProTeacher

Tag: Art and Aesthetics

  • UGC NET UNIT 4 – ART AND AESTHETICS – Performing Arts

    1. Introduction

    The concept of Art (Kāla) and Aesthetics (Saundarya) in the Indian tradition finds its most profound expression in the Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharata Muni, where art is viewed as both a path to spiritual elevation and a refined means of emotional communication.
    Unlike Western aesthetics that often separates art and life, the Indian aesthetic view perceives art as an imitation of the inner reality of life (Ātman), leading to Rasa-anubhava — the aesthetic experience of bliss.

    2. The “Rasasūtra” of Bharata

    Bharata’s most famous contribution to aesthetic theory is encapsulated in the aphorism known as the Rasasūtra from the 6th Chapter of the Nāṭyaśāstra:

    “Vibhāvānubhāvavyabhicārisaṁyogād rasa-niṣpattiḥ”
    — Nāṭyaśāstra, VI.32

    Meaning:
    Rasa arises from the combination of Vibhāvas (determinants), Anubhāvas (consequents), and Vyabhicāribhāvas (transitory emotions).

    Thus, Rasa is the aesthetic relish or emotional essence experienced by the sensitive spectator (sahr̥daya). It is not the real emotion itself, but its refined artistic transformation.

    3. The Core Elements of Rasa Theory

    (a) Vibhāva – Determinants

    The causes or situations that evoke emotion.

    • Ālambana-vibhāva: the person or object causing emotion (e.g., hero, beloved).

    • Uddīpana-vibhāva: the environment or stimulants enhancing emotion (e.g., moonlight, music).

    (b) Anubhāva – Consequents

    The external, visible expressions of inner feeling — gestures, tone, movement, tears, fainting, laughter, etc. They make emotion perceptible to the audience.

    (c) Vyabhicāribhāva (Sañcārī-bhāva) – Transitory Emotions

    Short-lived mental states supporting the main emotion, such as anxiety, joy, fatigue, doubt, pride, fear, etc.
    There are 33 Vyabhicāribhāvas.

    (d) Sthāyībhāva – Permanent Emotion

    The dominant emotion residing in the mind that, when artistically evoked, transforms into a Rasa.
    For example:

    • Rati (love) → Śṛṅgāra Rasa

    • Krodha (anger) → Raudra Rasa

    • Utsāha (energy) → Vīra Rasa

    • Śoka (grief) → Karuṇa Rasa

    • Hāsa (mirth) → Hāsya Rasa

    • Jugupsā (disgust) → Bībhatsa Rasa

    • Bhaya (fear) → Bhayānaka Rasa

    • Vismaya (wonder) → Adbhuta Rasa

    • Sama (tranquility) → Śānta Rasa

    (e) Sāttvika-bhāvas – Involuntary Physical Reactions

    Eight involuntary emotional signs like trembling, blushing, tears, fainting, perspiration — signifying the intensity of internal feeling.
    They are āveśa-lakṣaṇas — manifestations of deep inner emotion.

    4. How Rasa is Experienced

    When the actor performs a bhāva (emotion) using the tools of Abhinaya (expression) — the spectator, detached from personal emotion, experiences Rasa.
    This is not the raw feeling (bhāva) but its aestheticized essence.
    For instance, real grief causes pain, but artistic grief in a play leads to Karuṇa-rasa, a refined pleasure through empathy.

    Thus, Bhāva is the seed; Rasa is the flower.

    5. Elaboration by Later Commentators

    (a) Bhattalollata (9th century CE)

    • One of the earliest commentators on the Rasa theory.

    • Proposed the “Rasa as Vyakti (manifestation)” theory.

    • Rasa, according to him, is the manifested emotion of the character that the spectator perceives.

    • However, he treated Rasa as objective — something shown by the actor, not experienced by the spectator.

    Limitation: It does not explain how the audience “tastes” Rasa internally.

    (b) Śrī Śaṅkuka

    • Introduced the concept of Anukaraṇa-vāda — Rasa as Representation.

    • The actor imitates or “re-presents” the emotional state.

    • Rasa, therefore, is the inference (anumāna) made by the spectator that the actor’s emotion is “like” the real one.

    • This approach made Rasa a process of cognitive recognition, not direct experience.

    Limitation: Reduces the emotional power of Rasa to a mere logical inference.

    (c) Bhaṭṭanāyaka

    • Revolutionary thinker who gave the “Bhāvanā-vāda” theory.

    • Shifted Rasa from the external (actor) to the internal (spectator).

    • Introduced three key concepts:

      1. Bhāvakatva – Transformation of personal emotions into generalized ones through art.

      2. Bhojakatva – The spectator’s capacity to enjoy (bhoga) these generalized emotions.

      3. Rasa-niṣpatti – The spiritual realization or experience of bliss through art.

    For him, Rasa is the spiritual savor (ānanda) experienced by the Sahr̥daya — a fusion of cognition and emotion, leading to transcendence.

    (d) Abhinavagupta (c. 10th–11th century CE)

    • The greatest aesthetician of India; commentator of Abhinavabhāratī on Nāṭyaśāstra.

    • Synthesized previous theories into a comprehensive aesthetic philosophy.

    • Integrated Bharata’s psychology with Kashmiri Śaivism (Abheda–Advaita).

    Key points of Abhinava’s theory:

    1. Rasa is universalized emotion — freed from personal context (sādhāraṇīkaraṇa).

    2. The spectator doesn’t feel his own emotion but a generalized, blissful version of it.

    3. This universality produces aesthetic rapture (Rasa-ānanda), akin to spiritual realization.

    4. Art thus becomes a mirror of the self, leading to self-awareness and liberation-like joy.

    His formula:

    “Rasa is the transformation of emotion into universal bliss through empathetic imagination.”

    6. The Structure of Rasa Experience

    Stage Process Example
    1. Vibhāva Cause/stimulus Hero and beloved meeting
    2. Anubhāva External expression Smiles, gestures, speech
    3. Vyabhicāribhāva Supporting feelings Jealousy, anxiety, excitement
    4. Sthāyībhāva Dominant emotion Love (rati)
    5. Rasa Aesthetic essence Śṛṅgāra-rasa

    The audience “relishes” this experience as aesthetic pleasure — detached yet empathetic.
    This pleasure is non-utilitarian, spiritual, and intellectualized emotion (rasa-anubhava).

    7. The Definition and Purpose of Art

    (a) Definition (Indian View):

    Art (Kāla) is a creative transformation of inner experience through bhāva and abhinaya to generate rasa in the spectator.
    It combines emotion, intellect, and imagination.

    (b) Purpose of Art:

    1. Śikṣā (Education) – to teach ethical and moral values.

    2. Vihāra (Recreation) – to provide joy and relief from mundane worries.

    3. Mokṣa (Liberation) – to awaken higher consciousness and spiritual insight.
      (As per Bharata: Nāṭya fulfills all human goals — Dharma, Artha, Kāma, and Mokṣa.)

    (c) Elements of Art:

    1. Imagination (Kalpanā) – creative conception.

    2. Expression (Abhinaya) – communication through form and medium.

    3. Harmony (Laya/Saundarya) – balance and beauty in design.

    4. Rasa (Aesthetic Essence) – emotional resonance.

    5. Universality (Sādhāraṇīkaraṇa) – detached yet empathetic enjoyment.

    8. Introduction to Performance Studies

    Performance Studies is an interdisciplinary field analyzing how art, ritual, and social behavior become performative.
    It merges insights from theatre, anthropology, and semiotics.

    Key ideas:

    • Performance as Behavior: Every act is performative — ritual, play, protest, or theatre (Richard Schechner).

    • Restored Behavior: Performances re-present behaviors learned and repeated in society.

    • Performer–Audience Interaction: Central to meaning-making, echoing the Nāṭyaśāstra’s Sahr̥daya concept.

    • Embodied Knowledge: The performer’s body is both instrument and text — comparable to Angika Abhinaya.

    Performance Studies thus bridges ancient Nāṭya theory and modern analysis of art in cultural contexts.

    9. Western Theories of Art and Aesthetics

    The following concepts parallel and contrast Bharata’s Rasa approach:

    (a) Art as Imitation (Mimesis) – Plato and Aristotle

    • Plato: Art is an imitation (mimesis) of physical reality, which itself is a shadow of the ideal — hence twice removed from truth.

    • Aristotle: Defended art — imitation leads to Catharsis, a purgation or purification of emotions like pity and fear through tragedy.

    Comparison:

    • Rasa ≈ Catharsis — both transform emotion into pleasure, but Rasa is spiritual and universal, not moral or psychological alone.

    (b) Art as Imagination – Kant and Coleridge

    • Kant: Art arises from the “free play” of imagination and understanding.

    • Coleridge: The artist unites reality and imagination — a synthetic power of creation.

    • Art is not imitation but creation of new reality through imagination.

    Indian Parallel:
    Kalpanā and Bhāvanā-vāda of Bhaṭṭanāyaka view art as the imaginative recreation of emotion.

    (c) Art as Beauty – Aesthetic Idealism

    • Hegel: Beauty is the sensuous manifestation of the Idea; art reveals spiritual truth.

    • Croce: Beauty is pure intuition; the artist’s expression of inner vision.
      Indian parallel: Rasa-ānanda and Śānta Rasa — the experience of universal beauty through aesthetic bliss.

    (d) Art as Communication – Tolstoy and Dewey

    • Tolstoy: Art transmits emotions from artist to audience; sincerity determines value.

    • John Dewey: Art is experience — the integration of doing and undergoing; art communicates meaning through form.
      Parallel: Bharata’s Abhinaya system — art as communication of emotion (bhāva) producing rasa.

    (e) Art as Utility – Marxist and Pragmatist Views

    • Art reflects material conditions and social purpose (Brecht, Marxist aesthetics).

    • Function is didactic, critical, and revolutionary — art for social change.
      Indian Parallel: Folk and ritual arts also serve social and moral functions (śikṣā).

    10. Comparative Insight: Indian vs Western Aesthetics

    Aspect Indian (Rasa Theory) Western (Classical–Modern)
    Basis Psychological–spiritual Philosophical–mimetic
    Emotion Transcendental bliss (ānanda) Cathartic release or perception
    Aim Self-realization (ātma-sākṣātkāra) Moral, emotional, or social effect
    Audience Sahr̥daya (sympathetic, detached) Observer or critic
    Artist Medium of the divine Creative individual
    Art–Life relation Integrated and sacred Often distinct or secular

    11. Conclusion

    The Rasa Theory of Bharata, expanded by Lollata, Śaṅkuka, Bhaṭṭanāyaka, and Abhinavagupta, remains the most profound contribution to world aesthetics.
    It transforms art from mere imitation into spiritual revelation, emotion into blissful experience, and performance into a mirror of the self.

    While Western thought evolved from Mimesis to Imagination to Communication, Indian aesthetics already envisioned art as universal, empathetic, and transcendental — a bridge between the sensory and the spiritual.

    In the words of Abhinavagupta:

    “When the heart melts in aesthetic relish, one experiences the very taste of Brahman.”