ProTeacher

Tag: NCERT Class 12 English

  • Summary of Chapter – 5, Poetry, NCERT, Flamingo, Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers 

    Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers

    Adrienne Rich’s Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers is a feminist poem that highlights the struggles of women trapped in patriarchal marriages and contrasts them with their unfulfilled desire for freedom.

    The poem begins with Aunt Jennifer’s embroidered tigers. They prance across the screen, shining like topaz in a green world. These tigers are fearless, elegant, and confident, moving with assurance and dignity. They are unafraid of men beneath the trees. Through this imagery, the poet presents an ideal of strength and independence.

    In contrast, Aunt Jennifer herself is weak and oppressed. Her fingers flutter nervously as she works on her embroidery. Even the ivory needle is difficult for her to pull, not just because of age but because of the “massive weight of Uncle’s wedding band.” The band symbolises her burdens in marriage — responsibilities, domination, and lack of freedom.

    The third stanza describes her after death. Even in her grave, her hands will remain “ringed with ordeals,” showing that patriarchal oppression leaves permanent marks. However, the tigers she created will continue to prance proudly, unaffected by fear. Her art becomes her lasting expression of strength and defiance.

    The poem contrasts two worlds: Aunt Jennifer’s real life, filled with fear and subjugation, and the world of her art, filled with courage and freedom. Rich suggests that women’s creativity becomes a means of expressing resistance against patriarchy.

    Ultimately, the poem is a critique of gender inequality. It shows how marriage, instead of being a partnership, often becomes a prison for women. At the same time, it celebrates women’s inner strength, which survives through their creativity, even when their lives are outwardly oppressed.

    Word Count: ~503

    Biography of Adrienne Rich

    Adrienne Rich (1929–2012) was an American poet, essayist, and feminist theorist, widely regarded as one of the most influential voices in contemporary literature and social thought.

    She was born on 16 May 1929 in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Her father, Arnold Rice Rich, was a pathologist, and her mother, Helen, was a pianist and composer. Rich grew up in an intellectual environment and was encouraged to write from a young age.

    She studied at Radcliffe College of Harvard University, where she published her first poetry collection, A Change of World (1951), which was selected by poet W.H. Auden for the Yale Younger Poets Award. Early in her career, her poetry followed traditional forms, but later she adopted free verse to express radical ideas.

    Adrienne Rich’s writing evolved alongside her political engagement. She became deeply involved in the women’s movement, civil rights struggles, and opposition to war. Her poems and essays combined artistry with social critique, addressing themes of gender inequality, racism, militarism, and sexuality.

    She published nineteen volumes of poetry, including Diving into the Wreck (1973), which won the National Book Award. She also wrote influential essays, such as Of Woman Born (1976), which examined motherhood in patriarchal society.

    Her style is marked by clarity, honesty, and resistance to oppression. She gave voice to women’s experiences, challenging traditional roles and offering new possibilities for identity and empowerment.

    Rich received numerous honours, including the National Book Award, the Bollingen Prize, and the Ruth Lilly Poetry Prize. In 1997, she famously refused the National Medal of Arts to protest U.S. government policies, showing her commitment to principles over recognition.

    She passed away on 27 March 2012 in Santa Cruz, California, at the age of 82.

    Adrienne Rich is remembered not only as a major literary figure but also as a courageous activist. Through her poetry and prose, she inspired generations to fight for equality, justice, and creative freedom.

  • Class 12th Poetry, English – Flamingo, Chapter – 5

    NCERT Flamingo – Class 12 English Core

    Poem 5: Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers – Adrienne Rich

    Page 99 – Think It Out

    Q1. How do ‘denizens’ and ‘chivalric’ add to our understanding of the tiger’s attitudes?
    Answer:
    The word denizens means inhabitants, suggesting that the tigers belong confidently to the forest. They are not intruders but natural lords of their environment. The word chivalric shows their nobility, elegance, and fearless self-assurance. Together, these words emphasise that the tigers embody qualities of strength, dignity, and fearlessness — qualities Aunt Jennifer lacks in her own life.

    Q2. Why do you think Aunt Jennifer’s hands are ‘fluttering through her wool’ in the second stanza? Why is she finding the needle so hard to pull?
    Answer:
    Aunt Jennifer’s fluttering fingers suggest her nervousness, weakness, and lack of freedom. The needle is hard to pull because the weight of patriarchal oppression — symbolised by the heavy wedding band — restricts her. The image reveals her physical frailty and emotional suppression under her husband’s authority.

    Q3. What is suggested by the image ‘massive weight of Uncle’s wedding band’?
    Answer:
    The wedding band symbolises the institution of marriage, which for Aunt Jennifer is oppressive rather than liberating. Its “massive weight” represents the burden of male dominance, loss of independence, and gender inequality. The phrase suggests that her marriage has become a heavy chain, restraining her spirit and creativity.

    Q4. Of what or of whom is Aunt Jennifer terrified in the third stanza?
    Answer:
    She is terrified of the ordeals of her married life and of her husband’s authority. Even after her death, her hands will still symbolically bear the marks of fear, showing how deeply patriarchy has controlled and subdued her life.

    Q5. What are the ‘ordeals’ Aunt Jennifer is surrounded by? Why is it significant that the poet uses the word ‘ringed’? What are the meanings of the word ‘ringed’ in the poem?
    Answer:
    The ordeals are the hardships and struggles Aunt Jennifer faced due to male dominance in marriage. The word ringed is significant because it has multiple meanings:

    • Literally: her finger is ringed with the wedding band.

    • Figuratively: she is encircled and trapped by patriarchal ordeals.
      Thus, ringed suggests both the physical symbol of marriage and the metaphorical prison of oppression.

    Q6. Why do you think Aunt Jennifer created animals that are so different from her own character? What might the poet be suggesting through this difference?
    Answer:
    Aunt Jennifer creates tigers that are fearless, proud, and powerful, while she herself is timid, oppressed, and weak. This contrast highlights the difference between her inner desires and her external reality. The poet suggests that women, though outwardly subdued by patriarchy, still nurture inner dreams of freedom and strength. Art becomes Aunt Jennifer’s way of expressing what she cannot live.

    Q7. Interpret the symbols found in this poem.
    Answer:

    • Tigers: Symbolise strength, courage, and freedom — qualities women desire.

    • Wedding band: Symbol of patriarchal control and marital oppression.

    • Embroidery/Panel: Symbol of creative expression, a space where Aunt Jennifer projects her unfulfilled desires.

    • Fluttering hands: Symbol of weakness, fear, and suppression.

    Q8. Do you sympathise with Aunt Jennifer? What is the attitude of the speaker towards Aunt Jennifer?
    Answer:
    Yes, the poem invites deep sympathy for Aunt Jennifer, who suffers silently under patriarchal authority. The speaker’s attitude is empathetic and critical of social structures that deny women freedom. The tone is compassionate, exposing the oppression and celebrating her art as an act of resistance.

    Extra Questions & Answers

    Long Questions 

    Q1. How does Adrienne Rich contrast Aunt Jennifer’s life with the tigers she creates?
    Answer:
    Adrienne Rich presents a striking contrast between Aunt Jennifer’s timid, oppressed existence and the bold, fearless tigers she embroiders. Aunt Jennifer is weak, her fingers fluttering nervously as she pulls the needle. The heavy wedding band symbolises her marital burdens and the patriarchal domination that suppresses her individuality. She is terrified, subdued, and unable to assert herself.

    By contrast, her tigers are bright, elegant, and chivalric. They move with dignity, unafraid of men. These tigers symbolise qualities that Aunt Jennifer desires but cannot live: courage, independence, and fearlessness. The artwork thus becomes a form of escape and resistance, where she expresses the strength denied to her in real life.

    The poet suggests that though women may be suppressed outwardly, their creativity keeps their inner desires alive. While Aunt Jennifer’s body will remain ringed with ordeals even after death, her tigers will continue to prance proudly, symbolising eternal freedom. This contrast makes the poem a critique of patriarchy and a celebration of women’s resilience.

    Q2. Explain the significance of the wedding band in the poem.
    Answer:
    The “massive weight of Uncle’s wedding band” is a central symbol in the poem. Literally, it refers to Aunt Jennifer’s marital ring. Figuratively, it represents the heavy burden of patriarchy. Instead of symbolising love, the wedding band becomes a chain of oppression, restricting her independence.

    It sits heavily on her hand, making even simple tasks like embroidery difficult. This shows how her creativity is restrained by marriage. Even after her death, her hands will remain “ringed with ordeals,” suggesting that patriarchy leaves permanent marks on women’s lives.

    By using this image, Adrienne Rich critiques how marriage in patriarchal societies often enslaves women instead of empowering them. The wedding band, meant to symbolise union, here symbolises subjugation.

    Q3. What message does Adrienne Rich convey through the poem Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers?
    Answer:
    The poem conveys a powerful feminist message. It highlights the oppression of women in patriarchal marriages, where they are denied freedom, burdened by responsibilities, and silenced by fear. Aunt Jennifer symbolises all such women whose creativity and individuality are subdued.

    At the same time, the poem celebrates women’s inner strength. Aunt Jennifer’s tigers, fearless and proud, represent the qualities women desire and express through art. While Aunt Jennifer herself is weak and oppressed, her tigers live on after her death, continuing to symbolise courage and independence.

    Adrienne Rich suggests that patriarchy cannot completely suppress women. Their creativity and imagination survive, leaving behind symbols of defiance and hope. The poem thus critiques gender inequality while affirming women’s resilience.

    Short Questions (2–3 lines)

    Q1. What do Aunt Jennifer’s tigers symbolise?
    Fearlessness, power, and independence — qualities denied to Aunt Jennifer in real life.

    Q2. Why are Aunt Jennifer’s hands fluttering?
    They reflect her nervousness, weakness, and the burden of patriarchal oppression.

    Q3. What does the phrase “ringed with ordeals” suggest?
    It means Aunt Jennifer’s life is encircled by marital hardships and oppression, leaving permanent marks even after death.

    Q4. How does Aunt Jennifer resist oppression?
    Through her art — embroidery — she creates tigers that symbolise the courage she cannot live.

  • Summary of Chapter – 4, Poetry, NCERT, Flamingo, A Roadside Stand

    A Roadside Stand

    Robert Frost’s poem A Roadside Stand presents the harsh contrast between the wealth of city people and the poverty of rural folk. With sympathy and humanity, Frost depicts the struggles of the poor who long for dignity and economic security.

    The poem describes a small roadside stand built by poor villagers beside a highway. They display wild berries, squash, and mountain views, hoping passing motorists will stop and buy. However, the polished city traffic speeds past, ignoring them. If drivers notice the stand, it is only to complain that it spoils the natural beauty of the landscape with crude signs.

    The poet highlights the villagers’ plea: they want some city money to expand their lives, enjoy modern comforts, and live like those in movies. They feel deprived of opportunities and cheated of prosperity by political leaders and social reformers. Frost satirises these so-called benefactors as “greedy good-doers, beneficent beasts of prey” who exploit the villagers in the name of help. Instead of empowering them, they weaken their ability to think for themselves, leaving them dependent and helpless.

    Frost also reveals the emotional suffering of the poor. The villagers wait all day with a “childish longing” for cars to stop. Their hope is like a prayer, but it is rarely fulfilled. Most cars that stop do so only to ask directions, turn around, or demand petrol — never to support the villagers’ business. This repeated disappointment deepens their despair.

    The poet himself feels heartbroken. He admits he can hardly bear the sight of their longing and sadness. For a fleeting moment, he wishes to put them “out of their pain” at once, but then realises that such a thought is neither humane nor a solution. Instead, he reflects on the need for genuine empathy and fair economic development.

    The poem concludes by exposing the gap between rural poverty and urban wealth. Frost conveys that the true progress of a nation cannot be achieved if villages remain neglected and deprived. The roadside stand becomes a symbol of rural suffering, ignored by the very people whose prosperity depends on exploiting rural resources.

    Thus, A Roadside Stand is a social critique as well as a compassionate appeal. It condemns urban indifference, political hypocrisy, and false promises, while highlighting the dignity and suppressed desires of the rural poor. Frost blends satire with deep sympathy, making the poem both critical and humane.

    Word Count: ~505

    Biography of Robert Frost

    Robert Frost (1874–1963) was one of the most celebrated American poets of the 20th century. Known for his realistic depictions of rural life and his use of everyday speech, Frost became a symbolic voice of New England and an interpreter of universal human experiences.

    He was born on 26 March 1874 in San Francisco, California. After his father’s death, his family moved to Massachusetts. Frost attended Dartmouth College and later Harvard University but never completed a degree. Instead, he pursued farming and teaching while writing poetry.

    In 1912, Frost moved with his family to England, where he met other poets like Edward Thomas and Ezra Pound. His first collections, A Boy’s Will (1913) and North of Boston (1914), established him as a major poet. Returning to America in 1915, Frost soon gained fame for his unique blend of simple rural imagery with profound philosophical depth.

    Frost’s poetry often explored human struggles, fears, and tragedies through the lens of nature. Famous poems like Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening, Mending Wall, Birches, and The Road Not Taken reflect themes of decision-making, isolation, duty, and acceptance of life’s burdens.

    He won the Pulitzer Prize for Poetry four times (1924, 1931, 1937, 1943), a record unmatched by any other poet. In 1961, he read his poem at President John F. Kennedy’s inauguration, cementing his place as a national poet.

    Though his poetry often used rural settings, Frost dealt with universal themes of human endurance, suffering, and reconciliation with life’s complexities. His style combined traditional verse forms with conversational language, making his work accessible yet layered with meaning.

    Robert Frost died on 29 January 1963 in Boston, Massachusetts, at the age of 88. He is remembered as a poet of simplicity and depth, whose works continue to resonate for their humanity, wisdom, and musical beauty.

  • Class 12th Poetry, English – Flamingo, Chapter – 4

    NCERT Flamingo – Class 12 English Core

    Poem 4: A Roadside Stand – Robert Frost

    Page 97 – Think It Out

    Q1. The city folk who drove through the countryside hardly paid any heed to the roadside stand or to the people who ran it. If at all they did, it was to complain. Which lines bring this out? What was their complaint about?
    Answer:
    The lines are:
    “The polished traffic passed with a mind ahead, / Or if ever aside a moment, then out of sorts / At having the landscape marred with the artless paint…”

    Their complaint was that the roadside stand spoiled the beauty of the countryside with its crude, poorly painted signs. They felt irritated rather than sympathetic.

    Q2. What was the plea of the folk who had put up the roadside stand?
    Answer:
    Their plea was simple: they wanted some of the city people’s money. They hoped this money would expand their lives, give them dignity, and allow them to live the life of prosperity they saw in movies and urban society.

    Q3. The government and other social service agencies appear to help the poor rural people, but actually do them no good. Pick out the words and phrases that the poet uses to show their double standards.
    Answer:
    The poet uses ironic phrases like “mercifully gathered in”, “greedy good-doers, beneficent beasts of prey”, and “enforcing benefits that are calculated to soothe them out of their wits”. These reveal how such agencies exploit and deceive the poor instead of truly helping them.

    Q4. What is the ‘childish longing’ that the poet refers to? Why is it ‘vain’?
    Answer:
    The “childish longing” refers to the poor villagers’ constant hope that a car will stop to buy their produce and give them money. It is “vain” because, despite their waiting all day, almost no cars stop, and if they do, it is only for selfish reasons, not to support the villagers.

    Q5. Which lines tell us about the insufferable pain that the poet feels at the thought of the plight of the rural poor?
    Answer:
    The lines are:
    “Sometimes I feel myself I can hardly bear / The thought of so much childish longing in vain, / The sadness that lurks near the open window there, / That waits all day in almost open prayer…”

    These lines express the poet’s deep sorrow at the poverty, helplessness, and endless disappointments of the rural poor.

    Extra Questions & Answers

    Q1. How does Robert Frost criticise political leaders and social agencies in the poem?
    Answer:
    Frost harshly criticises the hypocrisy of political leaders and social agencies who pretend to uplift the poor but actually exploit them. He calls them “greedy good-doers” and “beneficent beasts of prey.” These reformers plan to relocate villagers to new settlements with theatres and stores, where they won’t need to think for themselves. Their so-called “benefits” only soothe the poor “out of their wits,” making them dependent rather than independent. Instead of addressing real economic issues, they rob the villagers of dignity and self-reliance. Frost’s biting irony exposes their double standards and highlights the need for genuine reforms that empower, not weaken, the rural poor.

    Q2. What role does the roadside stand play as a symbol in the poem?
    Answer:
    The roadside stand is not just a physical shed selling produce but a symbol of rural poverty, deprivation, and unfulfilled desires. It represents the villagers’ plea for recognition, dignity, and fair economic opportunity. Each product — berries, squash, mountain views — reflects their simple yet honest way of life. However, the indifference of speeding city cars symbolises urban neglect and selfishness. The crude signs that irritate city folk show the villagers’ lack of resources, not their lack of worth. Thus, the stand symbolises the economic imbalance between cities and villages and the larger failure of society to bridge this divide.

    Q3. Discuss the relevance of A Roadside Stand in the context of modern society.
    Answer:
    The poem remains highly relevant today as economic disparity between urban and rural areas persists worldwide. Villages often remain underdeveloped, lacking education, healthcare, and employment opportunities, while cities flourish. Like the villagers in the poem, rural people still wait for “city money” and fair treatment. Politicians continue to make empty promises, and many rural initiatives fail to address real needs. In today’s consumerist society, urban people often treat the rural poor as invisible or burdensome. Frost’s poem thus calls for empathy, balanced development, and recognition that a nation’s progress depends on both cities and villages prospering together.

    Very Short Questions

    Q1. What do the villagers sell at the stand?
    Wild berries, golden squash, and a view of the beautiful mountains.

    Q2. Why do motorists not stop at the stand?
    They are too preoccupied, or they complain about the stand spoiling the scenery.

    Q3. What does the “childish longing” refer to?
    The villagers’ naive hope that cars will stop and bring them money.

    Q4. Why is Frost sympathetic towards the villagers?
    He feels their pain, helplessness, and despair at being ignored and exploited.

  • Summary of Chapter – 3, Poetry, NCERT, Flamingo, A Thing of Beauty

    A Thing of Beauty

    John Keats’s poem A Thing of Beauty is an excerpt from his longer work Endymion. The poem is a celebration of beauty in nature and its power to heal human suffering, provide solace, and offer everlasting joy.

    The poem opens with the famous line: “A thing of beauty is a joy forever.” Keats asserts that beautiful things never lose their charm; instead, their loveliness grows over time and they continue to bring joy. Beauty is eternal and provides comfort, like a peaceful bower offering dreams, health, and restful breathing.

    Despite life’s sorrows, despondence, and the scarcity of noble souls, beauty binds humans to the earth through a “flowery band.” It gives meaning to life even amid gloom and unhealthy practices. Keats suggests that beauty removes the “pall” (dark covering) from our spirits, lifting us from depression.

    The poet lists examples of beauty in nature: the sun, the moon, trees of all ages, daffodils blooming in meadows, small streams providing coolness in summer, and musk-roses enriching forest thickets. Each of these natural images fills the human mind with peace and delight.

    Keats also includes stories and legends as part of beauty. The “mighty dead” who performed noble deeds leave behind grandeur, inspiring humanity. The tales we read and the heroic figures we remember are sources of strength and joy, as eternal as natural beauty.

    The poem concludes with a striking metaphor. Beauty is described as “an endless fountain of immortal drink, pouring unto us from the heaven’s brink.” This suggests that beauty is divine, infinite, and ever-refreshing, like nectar from heaven that nourishes the soul eternally.

    Through this poem, Keats conveys his Romantic belief in the healing power of beauty. Beauty, for him, is not only aesthetic but spiritual, capable of sustaining mankind against despair and mortality. It makes life worth living and provides a connection between humans and the divine.

    Thus, A Thing of Beauty is both a tribute to nature’s splendour and a reflection of Keats’s philosophy — that beauty is eternal, uplifting, and a source of endless joy.

    Word Count: ~505

    Biography of John Keats

    John Keats (1795–1821) was one of the greatest poets of the English Romantic movement. Though he lived only 25 years, his poetry left an enduring legacy of beauty, imagination, and emotional depth.

    Keats was born on 31 October 1795 in London, the son of a stable-keeper. His father died when Keats was eight, and his mother when he was fourteen. Despite personal tragedies, Keats pursued education and was apprenticed to a surgeon. However, his passion for literature soon overtook his medical training.

    His first volume of poetry appeared in 1817, but it was with “Endymion” (1818), a long narrative poem, that he gained recognition. Though initially criticised, the famous opening line, “A thing of beauty is a joy forever”, later became immortal.

    Keats wrote during the Romantic era, alongside poets like Wordsworth, Byron, and Shelley. Unlike others, he focused on beauty, imagination, and sensory richness. His odes, including Ode to a Nightingale, Ode on a Grecian Urn, and Ode to Autumn, are considered masterpieces of English poetry.

    His life was marked by poverty, ill health, and struggles for recognition. He fell deeply in love with Fanny Brawne but could not marry her due to financial constraints and ill health. Tuberculosis, which had claimed his mother and brother, eventually afflicted him as well.

    In 1820, his health worsened, and he moved to Italy seeking a better climate. He died in Rome on 23 February 1821, at the age of 25, and was buried in the Protestant Cemetery. His gravestone bears the poignant epitaph: “Here lies One Whose Name was writ in Water.”

    Though his career was short, Keats’s poetry embodies the Romantic ideals of beauty, truth, and imagination. His work, filled with rich imagery and lyrical intensity, continues to inspire readers across the world.

  • Class 12th Poetry, English – Flamingo, Chapter – 3

    NCERT Flamingo – Class 12 English Core

    Poem 3: A Thing of Beauty – John Keats

    Page 94 – Think It Out

    Q1. List the things of beauty mentioned in the poem.
    Answer:
    The poem mentions the sun, the moon, trees old and young, daffodils, clear rills, musk-rose blooms, forest brakes, and lovely tales we have heard or read.

    Q2. List the things that cause suffering and pain.
    Answer:
    Human life suffers from gloom, despair, lack of noble souls, dark ways of life, unhealthy practices, and despondence that cause misery.

    Q3. What does the line ‘Therefore are we wreathing a flowery band to bind us to the earth’ suggest to you?
    Answer:
    It suggests that despite sorrows, beautiful things give us hope and joy, binding us to life. Beauty provides a reason to love the world and stay connected to it.

    Q4. What makes human beings love life in spite of troubles and sufferings?
    Answer:
    The presence of beauty in nature — the sun, moon, flowers, trees, streams, stories, and heroic tales — lifts the human spirit and makes life worth living despite difficulties.

    Q5. Why is ‘grandeur’ associated with the ‘mighty dead’?
    Answer:
    Because great people, after death, leave behind noble deeds, legends, and glory. Their grandeur inspires future generations, giving them strength and hope.

    Q6. Do we experience things of beauty only for short moments or do they make a lasting impression on us?
    Answer:
    Things of beauty make a lasting impression. They are “a joy forever,” whose loveliness increases with time and never fades into nothingness.

    Q7. What image does the poet use to describe the beautiful bounty of the earth?
    Answer:
    Keats describes beauty as “an endless fountain of immortal drink” pouring upon us from heaven’s brink, symbolising eternal and divine joy.

    Extra Questions & Answers

    Q1. How does Keats describe the relationship between beauty and human suffering?
    Answer:
    Keats acknowledges that life is full of sorrow, despair, and gloom. However, beauty in nature and noble deeds of great people lift the human spirit, providing hope and joy. Beauty acts as an antidote to suffering, offering moments of peace and lasting comfort.

    Q2. Explain the symbolism of “endless fountain of immortal drink” in the poem.
    Answer:
    This image symbolises the eternal, divine, and life-giving quality of beauty. Like a fountain that never dries, beauty nourishes human beings forever, refreshing their spirits and binding them to life.

    Q3. What Romantic ideals are reflected in Keats’s poem?
    Answer:
    The poem reflects Romanticism through love of nature, emphasis on beauty, imagination, and belief in the spiritual and healing power of the natural world. Keats sees beauty as a divine force connecting humanity with eternity.

    Q4. What role do tales and legends play in the poem?
    Answer: They inspire people with grandeur, preserving the memory of the “mighty dead” and adding to life’s beauty.

    Q5. How do trees serve as things of beauty?
    Answer: Old and young trees provide shade, comfort, and continuity of life, symbolising nature’s nurturing power.

    Q6. Why is beauty described as “a joy forever”?
    Answer: Because it never fades; instead, its loveliness increases and continues to give comfort eternally.

    Long Answer Questions

    Q1. How does John Keats describe the eternal nature of beauty in the poem?

    Answer:
    John Keats begins the poem with one of the most celebrated lines in English poetry: “A thing of beauty is a joy forever.”By this, he means that beauty never fades away or loses its charm. Instead, it continues to provide delight and comfort throughout our lives.

    Keats explains that beauty does not diminish with time; rather, its loveliness increases. It leaves behind an everlasting impression on the human mind, much like a sheltering bower that offers peace and restful sleep. Even when human beings face trials, gloom, or hopelessness, beautiful things help to lift their spirits and provide renewed hope.

    He uses powerful imagery to highlight the eternal nature of beauty. For instance, he compares beauty to an “endless fountain of immortal drink” pouring upon us from heaven. This metaphor suggests that beauty is divine, inexhaustible, and life-giving, much like nectar flowing eternally from the brink of heaven.

    Thus, Keats conveys that true beauty is eternal. It goes beyond physical attraction and touches the soul, binding human beings to the earth with joy, peace, and inspiration.

    Q2. How does the poem contrast things of beauty with the sufferings of human life?

    Answer:
    Keats acknowledges that human life is full of sorrows, disappointments, and challenges. He refers to “despondence,” “gloomy days,” and “all the unhealthy and darkened ways” that make life difficult. People often experience despair, lack of noble souls, and struggles that cover their spirit with a dark pall.

    Against this background, Keats presents the power of beauty. He asserts that beautiful things help us overcome sadness and suffering. Beauty provides a reason to stay connected to life, like a “flowery band” binding us to the earth. When despair threatens to overwhelm us, beauty reminds us of joy and peace.

    For example, he mentions the sun, moon, daffodils, clear streams, and musk-rose blooms as sources of joy. He also includes stories of the “mighty dead,” whose noble deeds and grandeur inspire humanity. These examples show how beauty — whether in nature or in human achievement — can counterbalance suffering.

    Thus, Keats’s poem presents a contrast: while life is filled with hardships, beauty offers solace, hope, and inspiration, making existence worthwhile.

    Q3. What Romantic ideals are reflected in Keats’s poem A Thing of Beauty?

    Answer:
    The poem reflects key features of Romanticism, a literary movement that celebrated nature, imagination, and emotions. Like other Romantic poets, Keats found solace in the beauty of nature and expressed deep faith in its power to uplift human beings.

    Firstly, the poem glorifies nature. Keats lists the sun, moon, trees, daffodils, clear rills, and musk-roses as examples of beauty that bring joy to life. This reflects the Romantic belief in the healing and spiritual power of nature.

    Secondly, the poem emphasises imagination. Beauty is not just physical but also spiritual and eternal. Keats describes it as “an endless fountain of immortal drink,” a metaphor created through imagination to show its divine quality.

    Thirdly, the poem highlights emotions. Instead of focusing on reason or logic, Keats presents the emotional impact of beauty: it removes gloom, cures despair, and inspires joy.

    Finally, Romantic poets often valued the connection between the human soul and the divine. By associating beauty with immortality and heaven, Keats presents beauty as a spiritual force that transcends worldly suffering.

    Therefore, A Thing of Beauty perfectly embodies Romantic ideals of love for nature, imagination, emotion, and spirituality.

    Q4. Explain the significance of the image “an endless fountain of immortal drink” in the poem.

    Answer:
    The image of “an endless fountain of immortal drink” appears at the conclusion of the poem and serves as its most powerful metaphor. Here, Keats compares beauty to a divine fountain that pours eternal nectar from heaven.

    This image signifies that beauty is inexhaustible and everlasting. Just as a fountain never ceases to flow, beauty continues to nourish and refresh the human spirit throughout life. It is not temporary or perishable but eternal, like nectar that provides immortality.

    The metaphor also conveys the spiritual dimension of beauty. Keats suggests that beauty is a gift from heaven, a divine blessing that connects humans to the eternal. Unlike material possessions, which fade, beauty uplifts the soul and binds people to the earth with joy and peace.

    Through this image, Keats unites his central idea: that beauty is not just physical charm but a spiritual essence, eternal in nature, capable of healing sorrow and inspiring joy forever.

  • Summary of Chapter – 2, Poetry, NCERT, Flamingo, Keeping Quiet

    Keeping Quiet

    Pablo Neruda’s Keeping Quiet is a profound poem that emphasizes the need for introspection, peace, and harmony in the modern world. Written in simple language, the poem conveys a universal message of self-awareness, coexistence, and non-violence.

    The poem begins with a request to count to twelve and keep still. The poet suggests that for a moment, people all over the world should stop speaking, moving, or rushing. Such stillness, though unusual, would create a special moment — one of peace, strangeness, and unity, free from noise and aggression.

    Neruda imagines how this pause would impact the world. Fishermen would stop hunting whales, and salt-gatherers would stop their exhausting labour and notice their injuries. Soldiers and those preparing wars with gas and fire would stop their violence, put on clean clothes, and walk peacefully with their brothers. The poet’s vision is of a world without exploitation, violence, or destruction.

    However, Neruda clarifies that he does not advocate total inactivity or death. Life must go on, but it should not be lived in blind pursuit of progress or conflict. He criticises humanity’s obsession with constant activity, which prevents self-understanding. Instead, he proposes moments of silence that can heal sadness and prevent self-destruction.

    The poet draws inspiration from nature. He says the Earth teaches us that apparent stillness is not lifelessness. In winter, the Earth seems dead, but in spring, it bursts into life. Similarly, silence and rest can bring renewal and fresh energy to human beings.

    The poem ends with the poet repeating his request — to count to twelve, keep quiet, and embrace stillness. He promises to leave quietly after that, letting people absorb the lesson themselves.

    Through this simple imagery and profound message, Neruda highlights the importance of peace, unity, and reflection in a world filled with violence and restlessness.

    Word Count: ~504

    Biography of Pablo Neruda

    Pablo Neruda (1904–1973) was one of the greatest poets of the 20th century and a Nobel Laureate in Literature (1971). His real name was Neftali Ricardo Reyes Basoalto, born on 12 July 1904 in Parral, Chile. His father was a railway worker, and his mother, a school teacher, died shortly after his birth.

    Neruda grew up in Temuco and started writing poetry at an early age. By 1920, he adopted the pen name Pablo Neruda to avoid his father’s disapproval of his literary ambitions. At the age of 20, he gained international fame with his collection “Twenty Love Poems and a Song of Despair” (1924), which remains one of the most widely read works of Spanish literature.

    His poetry evolved from romantic themes to social and political concerns. He wrote about love, nature, human suffering, and the struggles of ordinary people. Collections like Residence on Earth (1933–41) reflected despair and alienation, while Canto General (1950) expressed his Marxist beliefs and solidarity with the oppressed of Latin America.

    Apart from being a poet, Neruda was a diplomat and politician. He served in the Chilean diplomatic service and was also a senator. His political affiliations with communism often brought him into conflict with authorities, forcing him into exile for some years.

    Neruda’s style is characterised by simple yet powerful imagery, emotional intensity, and universal themes. His ability to blend personal emotions with collective concerns made his work both intimate and socially significant.

    In 1971, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature for poetry that, with the action of elemental forces, brings alive a continent’s destiny and dreams. His later works continued to celebrate life, love, and humanity.

    Pablo Neruda died on 23 September 1973 in Santiago, shortly after the military coup in Chile. His legacy lives on through his vast body of poetry, which continues to inspire readers worldwide.

    He is remembered not only as a master poet of love and nature but also as a voice of justice, peace, and human dignity.

  • Class 12th Poetry, English – Flamingo, Chapter – 2

    NCERT Flamingo – Class 12 English Core

    Poem 2: Keeping Quiet – Pablo Neruda

    Page 91 – Think It Out

    Q1. What will counting up to twelve and keeping still help us achieve?
    Answer:
    Counting to twelve and keeping still will give us a moment of introspection, silence, and calm. It will help us stop our restless activities, end the rush of life, and reflect on ourselves. It can create peace, understanding, and unity among human beings.

    Q2. Do you think the poet advocates total inactivity and death?
    Answer:
    No. The poet clearly says he wants no association with death. He does not want total inactivity but only a temporary pause in our busy lives to appreciate silence, reflect on ourselves, and live more meaningfully.

    Q3. What is the ‘sadness’ that the poet refers to in the poem?
    Answer:
    The sadness is humanity’s failure to understand itself. People are obsessed with progress, violence, and destruction without self-reflection. This results in loneliness, conflict, and fear of death.

    Q4. What symbol from Nature does the poet invoke to say that there can be life under apparent stillness?
    Answer:
    He uses the example of the Earth. In winter everything seems dead, but later, in spring, life flourishes again. This shows that silence and stillness can lead to regeneration and renewal.

    Extra Questions & Answers

    Q1. What is the significance of “twelve” in the poem?
    Answer: It symbolises the twelve hours of the clock and twelve months of the year — a complete cycle of time, representing universality.

    Q2. How can silence bring about peace and brotherhood?
    Answer: In silence, people stop quarrelling, reflect on their common humanity, and feel connected, free from divisions of race, language, or nationality.

    Q3. What does the image of “wars with gas, wars with fire” represent?
    Answer: It represents the destructive wars and violence caused by human greed and hostility, which could be prevented by moments of introspection.

    Q4. What lesson can human beings learn from the Earth?
    Answer: That apparent stillness is not the end. Like the Earth regenerates after winter, moments of silence and rest can lead to renewal and a better life.

    Q5. How is the poem relevant today?
    Answer: In a world filled with conflicts, environmental destruction, and stress, Neruda’s call for silence, reflection, and unity is more relevant than ever.

    Long Answer Questions

    Q1. Explain the central idea of the poem Keeping Quiet.

    Answer:
    The central idea of Pablo Neruda’s poem Keeping Quiet is the importance of introspection, silence, and mutual understanding in human life. The poet asks people to take a pause from their busy lives, count to twelve, and remain still. This stillness is not inactivity or death but a chance to reflect on our actions, to realise the futility of violence, war, and exploitation. He imagines a world where fishermen would stop killing whales, salt-gatherers would rest and heal, and soldiers would put aside weapons. The poet reminds us that the Earth itself teaches us that apparent stillness is not lifelessness; from winter comes the regeneration of spring. Thus, keeping quiet becomes a symbol of peace, renewal, and universal brotherhood.

    Q2. How does Neruda use nature as a symbol in the poem?

    Answer:
    Neruda draws parallels between nature and human life to stress the value of silence. He invokes the Earth as a symbol: though it appears dead in winter, it regenerates with life in spring. This shows that silence and stillness are not the end but a stage before renewal. Similarly, if humans pause their destructive actions, they can rejuvenate and live in harmony. The “wars with gas and fire” contrast with the natural cycle of peace and regeneration. By using simple but powerful natural imagery, Neruda makes his message universal and accessible — teaching that silence and reflection can lead to new life, just as nature renews itself.

    Q3. How is the poem Keeping Quiet a call for universal brotherhood?

    Answer:
    The poem appeals to all humanity, beyond borders of nationality, race, and religion. Neruda asks everyone to count to twelve and keep quiet together. This symbolic act unites people, as silence transcends language and culture. He imagines a world where fishermen, labourers, and soldiers all pause their harmful activities, realising their shared humanity. The silence would dissolve barriers, creating empathy and understanding. By avoiding violence and embracing peace, people would feel like brothers instead of enemies. Thus, the poem is a global call for harmony and coexistence.

    Q4. Discuss the relevance of the poem Keeping Quiet in today’s world.

    Answer:
    The poem remains highly relevant in modern times. Today, humanity faces wars, terrorism, environmental destruction, consumerism, and relentless competition. People seldom pause to reflect on the consequences of their actions. Neruda’s suggestion of keeping quiet symbolises the need to slow down, introspect, and reconsider our choices. If nations paused before war, if industries paused before exploiting nature, much suffering could be avoided. Even in personal life, silence brings mental peace in the age of stress and digital noise. The poem urges us to find harmony with ourselves, others, and nature — a message that is timeless.

    Q5. How does the poet differentiate between ‘stillness’ and ‘total inactivity’? Why is this distinction important?

    Answer:
    Neruda clarifies that his call for silence is not an invitation to death. Total inactivity is lifelessness, but stillness is a temporary pause to reflect and rejuvenate. This distinction is crucial because people might misunderstand silence as death or inertia. The poet instead advocates a conscious stillness — stopping violence, stopping endless labour, and stopping wars for a moment. This pause would allow humans to gain self-awareness, heal relationships, and reconnect with nature. By differentiating stillness from death, Neruda emphasises that silence is life-giving, not life-denying.

    Q6. What human activities does Neruda criticise in the poem? How does he propose to correct them?

    Answer:
    Neruda criticises human greed and violence:

    • Fishermen killing whales.

    • Salt-gatherers overworking themselves.

    • Soldiers waging wars with gas and fire.

    • People blindly pursuing progress without reflection.

    He proposes a correction through silence and stillness. By pausing these destructive actions, people would understand their futility and choose peace and harmony instead. His solution is simple yet powerful — stop for a moment, keep quiet, and reflect. This alone could change the course of human life towards compassion and brotherhood.

  • Summary of Chapter – 1, Poetry, NCERT, Flamingo, My Mother at Sixty-Six

    Summary of My Mother at Sixty-Six 

    Kamala Das’s poem My Mother at Sixty-Six is a poignant portrayal of the poet’s deep love for her mother and her fear of separation due to old age and mortality. Written in a single sentence with flowing imagery, the poem captures a moment of introspection during a car journey, transforming it into a universal meditation on ageing and familial bonds.

    The poem begins with the poet driving from her parents’ home to Cochin airport on a Friday morning. She notices her mother dozing beside her, with her mouth open, her face pale and ashen like that of a corpse. This image shocks the poet, making her painfully aware of her mother’s age and mortality. For a moment, the realisation grips her with anguish — her mother is as old as she looks, fragile and close to death.

    To distract herself from the disturbing thought, the poet looks out of the car window. She sees young trees sprinting past and children spilling out of their homes in merry play. These images of youth, movement, and vitality are contrasted sharply with the stillness and lifelessness of her ageing mother. The juxtaposition highlights the cycle of life: while youth is energetic and full of promise, old age is passive and marked by decline.

    At the airport, after the security check, the poet looks at her mother again. She sees her wan, pale, and dull, resembling a late winter’s moon — dim and waning. This metaphor underscores both the beauty and fragility of old age, as well as the inevitability of decline.

    At this moment, the poet is overwhelmed by an old familiar ache — the fear she had since childhood of losing her mother. This fear of separation, now magnified by the visible signs of ageing, becomes the central emotional experience of the poem.

    Despite this inner turmoil, the poet does not express her grief directly. Instead, she puts on a brave face. At the time of parting, she simply says, “See you soon, Amma,” and smiles repeatedly. The smile is significant: it masks her anxiety, offers reassurance to her mother, and symbolises her effort to remain positive in the face of inevitable mortality.

    The poem’s structure — a single flowing sentence with commas — mirrors the continuous flow of thought in the poet’s mind, oscillating between painful realisations and comforting distractions.

    Thematically, the poem explores universal concerns: the inevitability of ageing, the bond between parent and child, the cycle of life and death, and the human tendency to deny or postpone thoughts of mortality. Through simple images — the mother’s ashen face, the sprinting trees, the merry children, and the late winter’s moon — Kamala Das conveys profound emotions with brevity and intensity.

    In conclusion, My Mother at Sixty-Six is not merely about the poet’s mother but about the universal experience of seeing loved ones grow old and confronting the reality of death. It captures the tension between inner grief and outward composure, making it a deeply moving and relatable poem.

    Word Count: ~503

    Biography of Kamala Das (Madhavikutty)

    Kamala Das (1934–2009), also known by her pen name Madhavikutty, was one of India’s most prominent poets and writers of the 20th century. She is celebrated for her bold, confessional style and her ability to express emotions of love, loss, identity, and womanhood with rare honesty.

    Kamala Das was born on 31 March 1934 in Punnayurkulam, Kerala, into a literary family. Her mother, Balamani Amma, was a renowned poet in Malayalam, and her father, V.M. Nair, worked in the automobile industry and later managed the popular journal Mathrubhumi. Growing up in such an environment, Kamala Das developed an early interest in literature.

    She received her early education in Calcutta and later in Kerala. At the age of fifteen, she was married to K. Madhav Das, a banker much older than her. Although her marriage provided stability, Kamala often felt emotionally unfulfilled, and she used writing as an outlet to express her inner struggles, desires, and search for identity.

    Her first collection of poetry, “Summer in Calcutta” (1965), brought her instant recognition. It marked a bold departure from conventional Indian poetry by openly exploring female sexuality, love, and loneliness. This was followed by “The Descendants” (1967) and “The Old Playhouse and Other Poems” (1973), which further established her as a leading Indian English poet.

    Kamala Das wrote not only in English but also in Malayalam under the name Madhavikutty. Her Malayalam short stories and novels often dealt with themes of women’s struggles within patriarchal society. Her autobiography, “My Story” (1976), shocked many readers with its frank portrayal of her personal life, including her marriage and relationships. Though controversial, it also earned her admiration for her courage and honesty.

    Her poetry is intensely personal yet universal. In works like My Mother at Sixty-Six, she conveys deep emotional truths in simple, lyrical language. She often used autobiographical elements to highlight the complexities of being a woman, a mother, a lover, and an individual seeking freedom.

    Over her career, Kamala Das received many honours, including the Asian Poetry Prize, Sahitya Akademi Award, and recognition in international literary circles. In her later life, she converted to Islam and took the name Kamala Surayya.

    Kamala Das passed away on 31 May 2009 in Pune, leaving behind a rich legacy of poetry and prose. She is remembered as a fearless voice in Indian literature, a pioneer of confessional poetry, and a writer who gave expression to the innermost emotions of women with honesty and power.

  • Class 12th Poetry, English – Flamingo, Chapter – 1

    Poem 1: My Mother at Sixty-Six – Kamala Das

    Page 89 – Think It Out

    Q1. What is the kind of pain and ache that the poet feels?
    Answer:
    The poet feels the deep emotional pain of realising her mother’s advancing age and the fear of separation by death. It is the same childhood fear of losing her mother, now revived as she sees her pale and frail face.

    Q2. Why are the young trees described as ‘sprinting’?
    Answer:
    The trees seem to sprint backwards as the car moves forward. Symbolically, the vitality and speed of the trees contrast with the stillness and lifelessness of her aged mother, highlighting the cycle of life and youth versus ageing.

    Q3. Why has the poet brought in the image of the merry children ‘spilling out of their homes’?
    Answer:
    The children symbolise life, energy, and carefree joy. This image contrasts with the ageing mother, underlining the difference between youth’s vitality and old age’s fragility.

    Q4. Why has the mother been compared to the ‘late winter’s moon’?
    Answer:
    The late winter’s moon is pale, dim, and waning. Similarly, the mother’s face is pale, colourless, and weakened by old age. The comparison captures her fragility and nearing decline.

    Q5. What do the parting words of the poet and her smile signify?
    Answer:
    Her words “see you soon, Amma” express hope and reassurance, though she knows the uncertainty of life. Her repeated smile is an effort to mask her anxiety and fear, projecting courage and positivity to comfort her mother.

    My Mother at Sixty-Six – Extra Questions & Answers

    Q1. What is the central theme of the poem?

    Answer:
    The central theme is the poet’s fear of losing her mother due to ageing and death. It reflects the universal reality of mortality, the bond of love between mother and daughter, and the human tendency to hide inner grief under outward composure.

    Q2. How does the poet use contrast to convey her emotions?

    Answer:
    The contrast lies between the mother’s pale, still face (symbolising ageing and death) and the lively images outside — sprinting trees and merry children (symbolising youth and life). This sharp opposition highlights the inevitability of ageing against the continuity of life.

    Q3. Explain the significance of the image “her face ashen like that of a corpse.”

    Answer:
    This simile conveys the mother’s frailty and closeness to death. It shocks the poet, making her face the reality of mortality. It sets the tone of fear and sadness that runs throughout the poem.

    Q4. What role does the image of the ‘late winter’s moon’ play in the poem?

    Answer:
    The late winter’s moon is pale, dim, and waning, just like the mother’s face. This metaphor highlights decline and fragility but also suggests quiet beauty. It reinforces the inevitability of ageing in the cycle of nature.

    Q5. What is the ‘familiar ache’ that the poet refers to?

    Answer:
    It is the childhood fear of losing her mother. Even as an adult, seeing her mother old and weak brings back this ache, showing how deeply rooted and universal this fear of separation is.

    Q6. Why does the poet smile at the end despite her fear?

    Answer:
    She smiles to mask her sorrow and reassure her mother. Her words “see you soon, Amma” are a brave attempt to hide her anxiety. The smile symbolises her courage and love, even as she fears separation.

    Q7. How is the poem autobiographical?

    Answer:
    Kamala Das often wrote about personal experiences. Here, she expresses her own feelings while parting from her ageing mother. The emotions of fear, love, and helplessness are drawn directly from her life, making the poem autobiographical.

    Q8. The poem runs in a single sentence. How does this style contribute to its meaning?

    Answer:
    The single, flowing sentence mirrors the poet’s unbroken chain of thoughts — from fear and distraction to grief and forced cheerfulness. It captures the stream of consciousness, making the emotions natural and spontaneous.

    Q9. How is the cycle of life reflected in the poem?

    Answer:
    The images of sprinting trees and merry children represent birth, youth, and continuity, while the mother symbolises decline and death. Together, they depict the inevitable cycle of life: youth replaces age, but life goes on.

    Q10. What universal message does the poem convey?

    Answer:
    The poem conveys that ageing and death are inevitable truths of life. It teaches acceptance of mortality, the importance of cherishing relationships, and the need to remain strong and loving even in the face of loss.

  • Summary of Chapter 8. Going Places, Flamingo, Class 12th English

    Going Places

    A.R. Barton’s Going Places explores the world of adolescent fantasies, hero worship, and the gap between reality and dreams.

    The story revolves around Sophie, a schoolgirl from a lower middle-class family. She dreams of wealth, sophistication, and glamour, despite her modest background. After school, she and her friend Jansie are destined to work in a biscuit factory. While Jansie is realistic, Sophie fantasises about opening a boutique, becoming a manager, an actress, or a fashion designer.

    Sophie lives with her working-class family in a cramped house: her father, a plump labourer fond of football and the pub; her tired mother burdened with housework; little Derek, who teases her; and her elder brother Geoff, an apprentice mechanic. Sophie admires Geoff’s silence and mysterious life. She imagines riding with him on his motorcycle, exploring exotic places. To her, Geoff symbolises freedom and entry into the adult world.

    Sophie’s most vivid fantasy is meeting Danny Casey, a young, talented Irish footballer who plays for United. She imagines seeing him in the arcade, talking about clothes, and planning to meet him again for an autograph. Geoff doubts her story but half-believes it, while their father dismisses it as one of her wild tales. Sophie clings to the fantasy, feeling it brings her closer to the glamorous world she longs for.

    She confides in Geoff but hides it from Jansie, fearing she would spread it. Later, she even goes to the canal at night, waiting for Danny Casey, imagining his arrival. But he never comes. Despite this, she convinces herself of the reality of her dream, replaying the imaginary meeting in her mind.

    The story ends with Sophie despondent yet still clinging to her fantasy. She imagines Danny Casey’s green eyes, shy smile, and the goal he scored during a real football match.

    Through Sophie, Barton portrays the natural tendency of teenagers to dream beyond their means. Such dreams give hope but also lead to disappointment. Sophie’s fantasies reflect her desire to escape poverty and reach a world of glamour, but they also show her immaturity in confusing dreams with reality.

    Going Places thus highlights the conflict between adolescent imagination and harsh social reality. It shows how hero worship and unrealistic fantasies can provide temporary comfort but also cause sadness when reality intrudes.

    Word Count: ~502

  • Class 12th English – Flamingo, Chapter – 8

    Chapter 8: Going Places – A.R. Barton

    NCERT SOLUTION

    Page 77 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. Where was it most likely that the two girls would find work after school?
    Answer: They were earmarked to work in the biscuit factory.

    Q2. What were the options that Sophie was dreaming of? Why does Jansie discourage her from having such dreams?
    Answer: Sophie dreamt of becoming a boutique owner, manager, actress, or fashion designer. Jansie discouraged her because such dreams were unrealistic for their financial condition; they were destined for ordinary factory jobs.

    Page 79 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. Why did Sophie wriggle when Geoff told her father that she had met Danny Casey?
    Answer: She wriggled uneasily because she feared her father’s disbelieving and aggressive reaction.

    Q2. Does Geoff believe what Sophie says about her meeting with Danny Casey?
    Answer: Geoff is doubtful but not dismissive. He finds her story unlikely but does not reject it outright, partly because he wants to believe her.

    Q3. Does her father believe her story?
    Answer: No, he dismisses it as one of Sophie’s wild fantasies.

    Q4. How does Sophie include her brother Geoff in her fantasy of her future?
    Answer: She imagines riding with Geoff on his motorcycle, wearing stylish clothes, exploring exotic places and meeting new people. Geoff symbolises her entry into a larger, glamorous world.

    Q5. Which country did Danny Casey play for?
    Answer: He played for Ireland.

    Page 83 – Understanding the Text

    Q1. Sophie and Jansie were classmates and friends. What were the differences between them that show up in the story?
    Answer: Sophie is dreamy, ambitious, and imaginative, while Jansie is practical, realistic, and grounded. Sophie fantasises about glamour, but Jansie accepts their destined life in the factory.

    Q2. How would you describe the character and temperament of Sophie’s father?
    Answer: He is practical, hardworking, and dismissive of Sophie’s fantasies. He is aggressive at times, cynical about her dreams, and more interested in football and the pub than in Sophie’s ambitions.

    Q3. Why did Sophie like her brother Geoff more than any other person? From her perspective, what did he symbolise?
    Answer: Sophie admired Geoff’s silence and mysterious life. He symbolised the adult, unknown world of freedom and opportunities that Sophie longed to enter.

    Q4. What socio-economic background did Sophie belong to? What are the indicators of her family’s financial status?
    Answer: Sophie belonged to a lower middle-class family. Indicators: her father’s manual labour, cramped steamy house, mother’s tiredness, Derek’s teasing, and their destined future in a biscuit factory.

    Page 83 – Short Questions

    Q1. Why didn’t Sophie want Jansie to know about her story with Danny?
    Answer: Because Jansie was nosey and would spread the story to the whole neighbourhood, creating trouble at home.

    Q2. Did Sophie really meet Danny Casey?
    Answer: No, her meeting was imaginary. It was her adolescent fantasy born from hero-worship.

    Q3. Which was the only occasion when she got to see Danny Casey in person?
    Answer: She saw him only during football matches when he played for United, once scoring a goal she witnessed with pride.

    Page 84 – Talking about the Text

    1. Sophie’s dreams and disappointments exist only in her imagination; they show her desire to escape reality.

    2. Teenage fantasies provide hope, ambition, and joy, but can also lead to frustration, disappointment, and escapism.

    Page 84 – Working with Words

    • “Words had to be prized out of him like stones out of a ground.” → Geoff spoke very little; it was hard to make him talk.

    • “Sophie felt a tightening in her throat.” → She felt emotional, uneasy, or anxious.

    • “If he keeps his head on his shoulders.” → If he remains sensible and avoids distractions.

    • “On Saturday they made their weekly pilgrimage to the United.” → Their regular, devoted visit to watch United’s match.

    • “She saw… him ghost past the lumbering defenders.” → He moved swiftly and smoothly past heavy defenders.

    Page 85 – Noticing Form

    Examples of present participle use:

    • “Coming home from school, Sophie said…”

    • “Linking arms with her, Jansie looked doubtful.”

    • “Staring far down the street, Sophie said…”

    • “Knowing they were both earmarked, Jansie became melancholy.”

    • “Leaving Jansie standing in the rain, Sophie turned in.”

    Other examples from the story: sitting at the table, waiting in the arcade, imagining his coming, balancing against doubts, walking by the canal.

    Page 85 – Thinking about Language

    Examples of colloquial/informal words:

    • “chuffed” = delighted

    • “nosey” = inquisitive

    • “gawky” = awkward

    Other examples: “bloke,” “mate,” “cool,” “kiddo,” “mess up,” “hang out,” “dude,” “ain’t,” “gonna,” “yikes.”

    Page 85 – Writing

    Q: Think of a person you would like as your role model. Write down points/questions for a TV interview.
    Answer (Sample):
    Role model: A.P.J. Abdul Kalam
    Questions:

    • What inspired you to become a scientist?

    • How did you face failures in life?

    • What message do you have for Indian youth?

    • How important are humility and simplicity in leadership?

    • What do you consider your greatest achievement?

    Page 85 – Things to Do

    Q: Other stories/movies with hero-worship themes:

    • Bend It Like Beckham (film – sports idolisation).

    • Rockstar (film – musical idolisation).

    • Fan (film – Bollywood hero worship).

    • Stories of fans of Sachin Tendulkar or Lionel Messi.

  • Summary of Chapter 7. The Interview, Flamingo, Class 12th English

    The Interview

    Christopher Silvester’s The Interview examines the history, function, and mixed opinions surrounding the practice of interviews, while also presenting an engaging excerpt from an interview with Umberto Eco.

    In Part I, Silvester traces the invention of the interview about 130 years ago and how it has since become central to journalism. Interviews are powerful because they give vivid impressions of personalities. However, opinions about them vary. Some see interviews as a form of art and a reliable source of truth. Others, particularly writers and celebrities, dislike them as intrusive and diminishing. Lewis Carroll avoided interviews, Kipling condemned them as immoral assaults, H.G. Wells called them ordeals, and Saul Bellow described them as “thumbprints on his windpipe.” Despite criticism, interviews remain an influential medium of communication, shaping public perceptions.

    Part II presents an interview conducted by Mukund Padmanabhan with Umberto Eco, professor at the University of Bologna and world-famous author of The Name of the Rose. Eco explains that although he appears to do many things, all his writings—novels, children’s books, essays—are linked by his ethical and philosophical concerns, especially peace and non-violence. He reveals his secret of productivity: making use of “interstices,” or small gaps of time in daily life.

    Eco also discusses his unconventional academic style, which narrates the story of research rather than presenting dry conclusions. This narrative quality, he believes, naturally led him into novel-writing, though he began only at fifty. Despite being globally recognised as a novelist, Eco insists he is primarily a university professor, regarding fiction as something he writes “on Sundays.”

    Regarding the phenomenal success of The Name of the Rose, Eco attributes it partly to mystery and timing. Though it is a complex novel with layers of history, theology, and metaphysics, millions embraced it, proving that readers do not always prefer “easy” literature. He notes that while journalists and publishers often underestimate readers, many seek challenging experiences.

    Through humour, anecdotes, and modesty, Eco’s interview provides insight into his personality as both scholar and storyteller.

    Thus, The Interview explores the double-edged nature of interviews — intrusive yet revealing, resented yet powerful — and highlights how they have become a defining form of modern communication.

    Word Count: ~503

  • Class 12th English – Flamingo, Chapter – 7

    Chapter 7: The Interview – Christopher Silvester

    NCERT SOLUTION

    Page 67 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. What are some of the positive views on interviews?
    Answer: Interviews are seen as a source of truth, a form of art, and a supremely serviceable medium of communication. Denis Brian wrote that most vivid impressions of contemporaries come through interviews.

    Q2. Why do most celebrity writers despise being interviewed?
    Answer: They see interviews as intrusive and diminishing. For instance, Lewis Carroll hated being lionised, Rudyard Kipling called interviews immoral, and Saul Bellow compared them to “thumbprints on his windpipe.”

    Q3. What is the belief in some primitive cultures about being photographed?
    Answer: They believe that being photographed steals one’s soul.

    Q4. Who, in today’s world, is our chief source of information about personalities?
    Answer: Interviewers, because much of what we know of public figures reaches us through interviews.

    Q5. What do you understand by the expression “thumbprints on his windpipe”?
    Answer: It means extreme discomfort and suffocation — Saul Bellow used it to describe the unpleasantness of being interviewed.

    Page 71 – Understanding the Text (Umberto Eco’s Interview)

    Q1. Do you think Umberto Eco likes being interviewed? Give reasons.
    Answer: Yes, he appears comfortable and humorous in interviews. He answers with anecdotes and explanations, showing openness and ease.

    Q2. How does Eco find the time to write so much?
    Answer: He uses small gaps of time in daily routine, which he calls “interstices,” such as while waiting for an elevator.

    Q3. What was distinctive about Eco’s academic writing style?
    Answer: His scholarly works have a narrative style, telling the story of research, unlike the usual dry, depersonalised academic style.

    Q4. Did Umberto Eco consider himself a novelist first or an academic scholar?
    Answer: He considered himself a university professor first, who wrote novels on Sundays. He identified with the academic community.

    Q5. What is the reason for the huge success of the novel The Name of the Rose?
    Answer: Eco felt its success was mysterious. While some credited its medieval theme, he believed it simply reached readers who enjoyed serious, difficult reading. Timing also played a role.

    Page 71 – Talking about the Text

    • Interviews provide direct insight into celebrities and their fields.

    • Television interviews add visual impact, while print allows detail; preferences vary.

    • Celebrities deserve privacy, but interviewers must balance curiosity with respect.

    Page 72 – Noticing Discourse Linkers and Signallers

    Examples:

    • “Which brings me to my next question…”

    • “But let me tell you another story…”
      Such linkers and signallers keep the conversation smooth and coherent.

    Page 73 – Writing

    Q: Write a short report of Eco’s interview.
    Answer (Sample Report):

    Report on Interview with Umberto Eco
    Umberto Eco, renowned scholar and novelist, explained that all his works stem from the same philosophical interests. He writes in “interstices” of time and believes scholarly writing should narrate the story of research. Though author of over forty scholarly works, he identifies as a professor rather than a novelist. Eco stated that The Name of the Rose, combining detective fiction with history and theology, achieved unexpected worldwide success. He attributed this to readers’ interest in serious literature, while acknowledging the mystery of timing in literary popularity.

  • Summary of Chapter 6. Poet and Pancakes, Flamingo, Class 12th English

    Poets and Pancakes

    Asokamitran’s Poets and Pancakes is an autobiographical piece describing his experiences at Gemini Studios, one of India’s most influential film companies. The essay humorously portrays the functioning of the studio, its characters, and its connection with politics and literature.

    The title comes from “Pancake,” the brand of make-up material used in abundance at the studio. The make-up room, housed in a building once Robert Clive’s stables, was staffed by men from different regions, reflecting national integration. Their task was to plaster actors with pancake, often making them look grotesque. The office boy, disappointed with his minor role, blamed Subbu, the No. 2 at Gemini Studios, for his failures.

    Kothamangalam Subbu emerges as a many-sided genius — poet, actor, screenplay writer, and novelist. His loyalty to the Boss, S.S. Vasan, and his creativity made him indispensable. Yet, his sycophantic demeanour earned him enemies. Another character, the legal adviser, ironically ruined an actress’s career by recording her angry outburst and playing it back to her.

    The story department, filled with poets and dreamers, spent more time discussing than writing. Most wore khadi and followed Gandhi but lacked deeper political awareness. They despised Communism, influenced by rumours of its violence. When Frank Buchman’s Moral Re-Armament Army visited, their professional plays greatly impressed the studio, influencing Tamil theatre for years.

    Later, an English visitor, Stephen Spender, delivered a baffling lecture. The studio staff, unfamiliar with English poetry and unable to follow his accent, found it meaningless. For years, the visit remained a mystery until the author discovered Spender’s connection with Encounter magazine and the book The God That Failed.

    The essay blends humour, satire, and nostalgia. It captures the contradictions of a film studio where barbers became make-up men, poets became scriptwriters, and a lawyer lost his job because the poets were dismissed. Asokamitran portrays human weaknesses with gentle humour, making the narrative engaging while providing insights into the film industry of the 1940s–50s.

    Ultimately, Poets and Pancakes is not only about films but also about creativity, disillusionment, and the absurdities of life. It reflects how literature, politics, and cinema intertwined in unexpected ways in India’s cultural history.

    Word Count: ~503

  • Class 12th English – Flamingo, Chapter – 6

    Chapter 6: Poets and Pancakes – Asokamitran

    NCERT SOLUTION

    Page 58 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. What does the writer mean by ‘the fiery misery’ of those subjected to make-up’?
    Answer:
    The make-up was done under blazing incandescent lights that generated extreme heat. The actors had to endure this heat, which made the process miserable.

    Q2. What is the example of national integration that the author refers to?
    Answer:
    The make-up department was staffed by people from various regions — Bengali, Maharashtrian, Kannadiga, Andhra, Madras Indian Christian, Anglo-Burmese, and Tamils. This reflected national integration even before it became a popular concept.

    Q3. What work did the ‘office boy’ do in the Gemini Studios? Why did he join the studios? Why was he disappointed?
    Answer:
    He applied make-up to crowd actors. He had joined the studios with the dream of becoming a star, director, or writer. He was disappointed because he remained stuck in a lowly job, his creative ambitions unfulfilled.

    Q4. Why did the author appear to be doing nothing at the studios?
    Answer:
    The author’s job was clipping newspapers and filing them. This seemed trivial and unimportant, so others thought he was idle.

    Page 60 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. Why was the office boy frustrated? Who did he show his anger on?
    Answer:
    He was frustrated with his unimportant work and lack of recognition. He vented his anger on Subbu, blaming him for his failures.

    Q2. Who was Subbu’s principal?
    Answer:
    His principal was the Boss of Gemini Studios, S.S. Vasan.

    Q3. Subbu is described as a many-sided genius. List four of his special abilities.
    Answer:

    • He was an excellent poet and wrote story-poems.

    • He was a brilliant actor in supporting roles.

    • He wrote screenplays and provided innovative story ideas.

    • He authored novels like Thillana Mohanambal and had a charitable, generous nature.

    Q4. Why was the legal adviser referred to as the opposite by others?
    Answer:
    He was supposed to protect others, but his act of recording a quarrelling actress destroyed her career. Hence, he was ironically called the opposite.

    Q5. What made the lawyer stand out from the others at Gemini Studios?
    Answer:
    He wore western attire (pants, tie, coat), unlike others in khadi dhotis. He looked cold, logical, and isolated among dreamers.

    Page 62 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. Did the people at Gemini Studios have any particular political affiliations?
    Answer:
    Most were Gandhiites, wore khadi, and opposed Communism. Their political views were vague and superficial.

    Q2. Why was the Moral Re-Armament Army welcomed at the Studios?
    Answer:
    Because the Gemini Studios admired their professionalism in plays and their message of peace and morality.

    Q3. Name one example to show that Gemini Studios was influenced by the plays staged by MRA.
    Answer:
    After seeing Jotham Valley, many Tamil plays copied its sunrise and sunset scenes with bare stages, white curtains, and flute music.

    Q4. Who was The Boss of Gemini Studios?
    Answer:
    S.S. Vasan.

    Q5. What caused the lack of communication between the Englishman and the people at Gemini Studios?
    Answer:
    His unfamiliar accent, the abstract nature of his talk, and the audience’s lack of knowledge about English poetry created a communication gap.

    Q6. Why is the Englishman’s visit referred to as an unexplained mystery?
    Answer:
    No one knew why an English poet was invited to a Tamil film studio. His lecture was irrelevant and incomprehensible.

    Page 63 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. Who was the English visitor to the studios?
    Answer:
    The English visitor was Stephen Spender, a poet and editor of the magazine Encounter.

    Q2. How did the author discover who the English visitor to the studios was?
    Answer:
    Years later, he saw Spender’s name in The Encounter magazine and also in the book The God That Failed.

    Q3. What does The God That Failed refer to?
    Answer:
    It is a book with essays by six writers, including Spender, describing their disillusionment with Communism.

    Page 64 – Understanding the Text

    Q1. The author has used gentle humour to point out human foibles. Pick out instances.
    Answer:

    • The make-up men turning actors into “crimson-hued monsters.”

    • The office boy’s frustration and misplaced anger.

    • The poets lounging around in khadi with no political understanding.

    • The baffling visit of Stephen Spender.
      This humour makes the narrative lively and satirical.

    Q2. Why was Kothamangalam Subbu considered No. 2 in Gemini Studios?
    Answer:
    Because he was multi-talented, loyal to the Boss, provided creative ideas, wrote stories and poems, acted brilliantly, and supported many dependents.

    Q3. How does the author describe the incongruity of an English poet addressing the audience at Gemini Studios?
    Answer:
    The simple Tamil film workers had no exposure to English poetry. Spender’s abstract lecture in a foreign accent was meaningless to them, creating absurdity.

    Q4. What do you understand about the author’s literary inclinations from the account?
    Answer:
    He was observant, critical, and interested in literature beyond films. His curiosity led him to libraries, books, and periodicals. He later became a successful writer.

    Page 64–65 – Talking about the Text

    • Film production today is advanced with modern technology, unlike the simple setups of Gemini Studios.

    • Poetry and films both reflect creativity, but films are collective, while poetry is individual.

    • Humour and criticism, when combined, highlight truths without bitterness, as Asokamitran’s style shows.

  • Summary of Chapter 5. Indigo, Flamingo, Class 12th English

    Summary of Indigo

    Louis Fischer’s Indigo highlights Mahatma Gandhi’s first major experiment with satyagraha in India during the Champaran movement (1917). It shows how Gandhi’s methods of truth, non-violence, and civil disobedience won justice for oppressed peasants.

    The story begins with Rajkumar Shukla, a poor sharecropper from Champaran, who persistently follows Gandhi and brings him to Bihar. The peasants were forced by British landlords to grow indigo on 15% of their land and surrender it as rent. When synthetic indigo reduced demand, landlords forced peasants to pay compensation for release. Many illiterate farmers, cheated into signing agreements, demanded their money back.

    Gandhi visited Muzaffarpur and Champaran to investigate. He faced hostility from British officials, was ordered to leave, but refused in the spirit of satyagraha. At his trial, thousands of peasants demonstrated, showing freedom from fear. Gandhi’s calm defiance impressed the court; the case was dropped.

    He then organised inquiries, collected testimonies, and confronted landlords. A commission was set up. Gandhi agreed to a 25% refund as compromise, explaining that principle mattered more than money. This humbled landlords and gave peasants courage. Eventually, the system of indigo sharecropping was abolished.

    Gandhi did not stop at political victory. He addressed social backwardness by opening schools, promoting cleanliness, sanitation, and health care. His wife Kasturba and volunteers like Mahadev Desai and Narhari Parikh joined in. Gandhi emphasised self-reliance, teaching villagers dignity and courage.

    A British follower, C.F. Andrews, offered help, but Gandhi refused, insisting that Indians must fight their own battles. This reinforced the lesson of self-reliance.

    The Champaran episode was a turning point. Gandhi declared that the British could not order him in his own country. It demonstrated that oppression could be resisted through truth and non-violence. It also marked the beginning of Gandhi’s leadership in India’s freedom struggle.

    Thus, Indigo is not just about peasants’ plight but also about Gandhi’s philosophy — combining politics with people’s everyday problems. It shows how courage, unity, and truth can overcome injustice.

    Word Count: ~503

  • Class 12th English Flamingo, Chapter – 5

    Chapter 5: Indigo – Louis Fischer

    NCERT SOLUTION

    Page 46 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. Strike out what is not true in the following:
    (a) Rajkumar Shukla was (i) a sharecropper.
    ✅ Correct Answer: He was a sharecropper (not politician, delegate, or landlord).

    (b) Rajkumar Shukla was (i) poor, (iii) illiterate.
    ✅ Correct Answer: He was poor and illiterate, but not physically strong.

    Q2. Why is Rajkumar Shukla described as being ‘resolute’?
    Answer: Because he followed Gandhi everywhere with determination, refusing to give up until Gandhi agreed to visit Champaran.

    Q3. Why do you think the servants thought Gandhi to be another peasant?
    Answer: Gandhi wore simple clothes and looked ordinary. They mistook him for a poor villager like Shukla.

    Page 48 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. List the places that Gandhi visited between his first meeting with Shukla and his arrival at Champaran.
    Answer: Lucknow → Cawnpore → Ahmedabad (ashram) → Calcutta → Patna (Rajendra Prasad’s house) → Muzaffarpur (Professor Malkani’s house) → Champaran.

    Q2. What did the peasants pay the British landlords as rent? What did the British now want instead and why? What would be the impact of synthetic indigo on the prices of natural indigo?
    Answer: Peasants had to grow indigo on 15% of their land and give it as rent. When Germany developed synthetic indigo, landlords asked for compensation to release peasants from this system. Synthetic indigo reduced demand and price of natural indigo.

    Page 50 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. The events in this part of the text illustrate Gandhi’s method of working. Identify some instances and link them to satyagraha and non-violence.
    Answer:

    • Refusing to leave Champaran despite official orders.

    • Facing trial calmly and pleading guilty out of moral duty.

    • Organising peasants peacefully.

    • Persuading lawyers to support peasants.
      These reflect satyagraha: truth, non-violence, civil disobedience, and self-suffering.

    Page 52 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. Why did Gandhi agree to a settlement of 25% refund to the farmers?
    Answer: Gandhi felt the amount was less important than the principle. The landlords had to surrender prestige and authority. This gave peasants courage and confidence.

    Q2. How did the episode change the plight of the peasants?
    Answer: It gave them self-respect, reduced exploitation, and ultimately ended the indigo sharecropping system. They realised they had defenders and rights.

    Page 53 – Understanding the Text

    Q1. Why did Gandhi consider the Champaran episode a turning-point in his life?
    Answer: Because it was the first time Indians won against British authority through non-violent civil disobedience. It gave Gandhi confidence and marked the beginning of his active leadership in India.

    Q2. How was Gandhi able to influence lawyers? Give instances.
    Answer: Gandhi questioned their motives, asking them to share peasants’ suffering. Shamed by his courage, they pledged to follow him even to jail.

    Q3. What was the attitude of the average Indian in smaller localities towards advocates of ‘home rule’?
    Answer: They were generally fearful of showing sympathy to nationalists, as seen in Professor Malkani’s unusual courage in hosting Gandhi.

    Q4. How do we know that ordinary people too contributed to the freedom movement?
    Answer: Thousands of peasants came to support Gandhi, protested peacefully, and gained confidence. Teachers, students, doctors, and women volunteered in education, sanitation, and health services.

    Page 53 – Talking about the Text

    Q1. “Freedom from fear is more important than legal justice for the poor.” Do you think the poor of India are free from fear after Independence?
    Answer: Though legal equality exists, many poor still suffer from fear of poverty, exploitation, caste and gender discrimination. True freedom requires economic and social justice, not just political freedom.

    Q2. The qualities of a good leader.
    Answer: A good leader must be courageous, truthful, selfless, compassionate, morally strong, and able to inspire unity and confidence, like Gandhi in Champaran.

    Page 53 – Working with Words

    Legal terms from the text: deposition, summons, bail, prosecutor, trial, judgment, evidence, contract, agreement, inquiry, communication.

    Page 54 – Thinking about Language

    Q1. Why does the author use quotations in his narration?
    Answer: Quotations bring authenticity, make the narrative lively, and let Gandhi’s words speak directly to the reader.

    Q2. Notice the use of commas:

    • If the subordinate clause comes first, use a comma.

    • If the main clause comes first, comma may be omitted.

    Page 54 – Things to Do

    Q: Choose an issue affecting the poor (like Bhopal Gas Tragedy, Narmada Dam) and suggest settlement.
    Answer (Example – Narmada Dam):
    Issue: Thousands displaced without proper rehabilitation.
    Facts: Villages submerged, livelihood lost.
    Arguments: Development vs human rights.
    Settlement: Provide land-for-land, fair compensation, housing, jobs, and involve people in planning.

  • Summary of Chapter 4. The Rattrap, Class 12th English

    The Rattrap

    Selma Lagerlöf’s short story The Rattrap is a touching tale of human loneliness, temptation, kindness, and redemption. Using the metaphor of a rattrap, the author conveys that the world is full of temptations that can trap human beings, but compassion and love can bring about transformation.

    The story begins with a poor peddler who wandered about selling rattraps of wire. His earnings were meagre, and often he had to beg or steal for survival. While thinking about his rattraps, he conceived the idea that the whole world is nothing but a rattrap. Just as rats are lured by food into traps, people are lured by riches, shelter, and comfort, only to be caught in the web of greed. This thought amused him, as life had never been kind to him.

    One evening, seeking shelter, the peddler knocked at the door of an old crofter who lived alone. The crofter welcomed him warmly, shared food, conversation, and even showed him thirty kronor that he had earned from his cow’s milk. The next morning, when the crofter left for work, the peddler stole the money and ran away. Soon he lost his way in the forest. Realising he was trapped by his own greed, he thought of his philosophy that the world is truly a rattrap.

    At last, he reached the ironworks where he was mistaken by the ironmaster for his old friend, Captain von Stahle. The ironmaster invited him home for Christmas. Fearing discovery, the peddler refused, but later his daughter Edla Willmansson persuaded him with her gentle and compassionate words. Unlike others, she treated him with dignity and trust.

    The next day, the ironmaster realised his mistake and wanted to throw him out. But Edla insisted on keeping him as a guest for Christmas, respecting his need for kindness. She gave him food, clothes, and a place to rest. Her empathy touched the peddler’s heart.

    The following morning, the family found a small packet left by the peddler. Inside was the stolen thirty kronor, a rattrap, and a letter. The letter stated that Edla’s goodness had transformed him from a petty thief into a man worthy of trust. He signed it “Captain von Stahle,” the name mistakenly given to him earlier, symbolising his inner rebirth and dignity.

    Through this story, Lagerlöf highlights the theme of human redemption. The crofter’s generosity was betrayed, the ironmaster’s kindness was based on mistaken identity, but Edla’s unconditional compassion succeeded in awakening the peddler’s conscience. The metaphor of the rattrap powerfully illustrates that life’s temptations can trap anyone, but it is kindness and respect that can release a person from the trap.

    In conclusion, The Rattrap is both entertaining and philosophical. It shows how even a thief can be reformed by love and empathy. It reminds us of the essential goodness in every human heart and the transformative power of compassion.

    Word Count: ~502

  • Class 12th English Flamingo, Chapter – 4

    Chapter 4: The Rattrap – Selma Lagerlöf

    NCERT SOLUTION

    Page 34 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. From where did the peddler get the idea of the world being a rattrap?
    Answer:
    He got the idea while thinking of his rattraps. He suddenly imagined that the whole world with its riches, joys, food, and shelter was nothing but a big rattrap to trap human beings.

    Q2. Why was he amused by this idea?
    Answer:
    The world had never been kind to him, so thinking ill of it gave him joy. He found it entertaining to imagine people being caught like rats in a trap.

    Q3. Did the peddler expect the kind of hospitality that he received from the crofter?
    Answer:
    No. He was surprised because usually he was turned away. But the old crofter welcomed him warmly, gave him food, tobacco, and company.

    Q4. Why was the crofter so talkative and friendly with the peddler?
    Answer:
    The crofter was lonely, without wife or children. He was happy to have someone to talk to, so he shared his food and confidences.

    Q5. Why did he show the thirty kronor to the peddler?
    Answer:
    He wanted to show proof of his cow’s productivity and his honesty. Out of pride, he displayed the notes to the peddler.

    Q6. Did the peddler respect the confidence reposed in him by the crofter?
    Answer:
    No. He betrayed the crofter’s trust by stealing the thirty kronor from the window.

    Page 37 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. What made the peddler think that he had indeed fallen into a rattrap?
    Answer:
    After stealing money, he lost his way in the confusing forest. He realised he was trapped by his own greed just like a rat in a rattrap.

    Q2. Why did the ironmaster speak kindly to the peddler and invite him home?
    Answer:
    The ironmaster mistook him for an old regimental comrade, Captain von Stahle, and invited him home for Christmas.

    Q3. Why did the peddler decline the invitation?
    Answer:
    He feared discovery of the stolen money and wanted to avoid unnecessary attention.

    Page 41 – Comprehension Check

    Q1. What made the peddler accept Edla Willmansson’s invitation?
    Answer:
    Edla spoke kindly and assured him he could leave freely after Christmas. Her compassion won his trust, and he agreed to go.

    Q2. What doubts did Edla have about the peddler?
    Answer:
    She suspected he might be a thief or an escaped prisoner because of his fearful and suspicious behaviour.

    Q3. When did the ironmaster realise his mistake?
    Answer:
    The next morning, in proper light, he saw the peddler cleaned and dressed. He realised he was not his old friend but a stranger.

    Q4. What did the peddler say in his defence when it was clear that he was not the person the ironmaster had thought?
    Answer:
    He admitted he never pretended to be anyone else and begged only to be allowed to stay in the forge. He also said the world itself was a rattrap and people get caught by temptation.

    Q5. Why did Edla still entertain the peddler even after she knew the truth about him?
    Answer:
    Because she felt pity for his homelessness and loneliness. She wanted him to enjoy at least one day of peace and kindness in the year.

    Page 42 – Understanding the Text

    Q1. How does the peddler interpret the acts of kindness and hospitality shown by the crofter, the ironmaster and his daughter?
    Answer:

    • Crofter’s hospitality he repaid with theft.

    • Ironmaster’s kindness he saw as a mistake of identity.

    • Edla’s compassion he valued deeply, as it touched his heart and inspired his transformation.

    Q2. What are the instances in the story that show that the character of the ironmaster is different from that of his daughter in many ways?
    Answer:
    The ironmaster is impulsive, proud, and quick to judge. He mistakes the peddler for his friend and later wants to throw him out. His daughter Edla, on the other hand, is gentle, compassionate, and persistent. She treats the peddler with dignity even after learning the truth.

    Q3. The story has many instances of unexpected reactions from the characters to others’ behaviour. Pick out instances of these surprises.
    Answer:

    • The crofter welcomed the peddler warmly instead of turning him away.

    • The ironmaster mistook the peddler for his old friend.

    • Edla, even after knowing the truth, let the peddler stay.

    • The peddler, instead of running away with money, returned it and left a gift.

    Q4. What made the peddler finally change his ways?
    Answer:
    The genuine kindness and respect shown by Edla awakened the goodness in him. He wanted to prove himself worthy of her trust and redeemed himself by returning the stolen money.

    Q5. How does the metaphor of the rattrap serve to highlight the human predicament?
    Answer:
    The rattrap symbolises life’s temptations—wealth, food, and shelter—which lure people but ultimately trap them. The peddler’s experience shows how humans can fall into these traps but also how redemption is possible through kindness.

    Q6. The peddler comes out as a person with a subtle sense of humour. How does this serve in lightening the seriousness of the theme of the story and also endear him to us?
    Answer:
    His witty remarks, like comparing the world to a rattrap and joking about people being caught, add humour to the serious narrative. This makes him human, relatable, and endears him to the reader despite his flaws.

    Page 43 – Talking about the Text

    Q1. Why was Edla happy to see the gift left by the peddler?
    Answer:
    She was relieved that her kindness was not misplaced. The peddler had repaid her trust with honesty, returning the stolen money and leaving a heartfelt letter.

    Q2. Why did the peddler sign himself as Captain von Stahle?
    Answer:
    Because Edla’s treatment made him feel respected like a captain. By signing that way, he honoured her kindness and symbolically transformed himself into a dignified person.

    Page 43 – Additional Talking Points

    Q1. The reader’s sympathy is with the peddler right from the beginning of the story. Why is this so? Is the sympathy justified?
    Answer:
    Yes. The peddler is poor, lonely, and mistreated by society. His petty thefts seem to come from desperation rather than malice. His redemption justifies the reader’s sympathy.

    Q2. The story also focuses on human loneliness and the need to bond with others.
    Answer:
    The crofter, the peddler, and even the ironmaster are lonely in different ways. Their actions—whether hospitality, theft, or mistaken kindness—show the universal human need for companionship and love.

    Q3. Have you known/heard of an episode where a good deed or an act of kindness has changed a person’s view of the world?
    Answer (Example):
    Yes. Many stories of prisoners reforming after being treated kindly or students excelling when a teacher shows faith in them prove how kindness transforms lives.

    Q4. The story is both entertaining and philosophical.
    Answer:
    The entertaining part comes from its twists—mistaken identity, theft, surprises. The philosophical depth lies in the metaphor of the rattrap, the themes of temptation, loneliness, compassion, and redemption.

    Page 43 – Working with Words

    Q1. Labels used for the man:

    • Peddler, stranger, tramp, ragamuffin, vagabond, guest, Captain von Stahle.
      Each reflects how others perceived him—from contempt to respect.

    Q2. Words similar to plod, trudge, stagger:

    • Shuffle, lumber, hobble, stumble, crawl.

    Page 43 – Noticing Form

    Examples of reflexive pronouns in the story:

    • “He amused himself.”

    • “He had let himself be fooled.”

    • “She thought of herself.”

    • “He kept to himself.”

    They are used for emphasis or to refer back to the subject in the same sentence.

    Page 44 – Thinking about Language

    Q1. Phrases from the ironworks context:

    • Big bellows groaned.

    • Burning coal cracked.

    • Charcoal into the maw of the furnace.

    • Hammer strokes from the forge.

    Q2. Indoor games in different regions:
    Examples – Ludo, Carrom, Chess, Playing cards, Chopar.

    Q3. Other terms for a small farmer:

    • Peasant, tiller, tenant farmer, sharecropper.
      In Indian languages: kisan, mazdoor, bataidar.