ProTeacher

Tag: Welfare Economics: Fundamental Theorems and Social Welfare Function

  • UGC NET Economics Unit 1-Welfare Economics: Fundamental Theorems and Social Welfare Function

    Part A – Basics of Welfare Economics (Q1–Q6)

    1. The main objective of Welfare Economics is to:

    (A) Study price determination
    (B) Analyze economic growth
    (C) Evaluate economic efficiency and social welfare ✅
    (D) Maximize private profit

    Explanation:
    Welfare Economics studies how resource allocation affects collective welfare — combining efficiency and equity concerns.

    2. Welfare Economics is concerned with:

    (A) Positive analysis
    (B) Normative analysis ✅
    (C) Statistical analysis
    (D) Descriptive economics

    Explanation:
    It makes value judgments about what is “good” or “bad” for society — thus, it is a normative branch of economics.

    3. The two key aspects of Welfare Economics are:

    (A) Growth and investment
    (B) Efficiency and equity ✅
    (C) Production and employment
    (D) Savings and investment

    Explanation:
    Welfare economics deals with efficient use of resources (efficiency) and fair distribution (equity).

    4. Which of the following is NOT a condition for Pareto Optimality?

    (A) Efficiency in exchange
    (B) Efficiency in production
    (C) Efficiency in product mix
    (D) Equal income distribution ✅

    Explanation:
    Pareto efficiency concerns resource use, not equality — even unequal allocations can be Pareto optimal.

    5. In welfare economics, value judgments are:

    (A) Avoided completely
    (B) Necessary for social welfare comparisons ✅
    (C) Not allowed in any case
    (D) Based only on money

    Explanation:
    Value judgments are essential to define what society ought to prefer, especially in constructing a Social Welfare Function.

    6. The welfare criterion that avoids interpersonal utility comparison is:

    (A) Kaldor–Hicks
    (B) Pareto criterion ✅
    (C) Social welfare function
    (D) Pigovian criterion

    Explanation:
    Pareto avoids comparing one person’s satisfaction with another — it only considers improvement without harm.

    Part B – The Fundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics (Q7–Q17)

    7. The First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics states that:

    (A) All efficient allocations are market equilibria
    (B) Every competitive equilibrium is Pareto efficient ✅
    (C) Monopoly ensures efficiency
    (D) Redistribution increases welfare

    Explanation:
    Under perfect competition, equilibrium automatically leads to Pareto efficiency — that’s the first theorem.

    8. The Second Fundamental Theorem states that:

    (A) All Pareto efficient points are competitive equilibria after redistribution ✅
    (B) Efficiency cannot coexist with equity
    (C) Market equilibrium is always fair
    (D) Government must fix prices

    Explanation:
    The second theorem shows that by redistributing initial endowments, any efficient point can be achieved through markets.

    9. The First Welfare Theorem is based on the assumption of:

    (A) Market imperfections
    (B) Perfect competition ✅
    (C) Monopoly power
    (D) Price controls

    Explanation:
    It assumes perfectly competitive markets — with no externalities and perfect information.

    10. The Second Welfare Theorem provides a theoretical justification for:

    (A) Laissez-faire capitalism
    (B) Redistributive policies ✅
    (C) Fiscal deficit
    (D) Monopoly regulation

    Explanation:
    It supports government redistribution to achieve desired equity, followed by free market functioning for efficiency.

    11. According to the First Welfare Theorem:

    (A) Markets always maximize social welfare
    (B) Competitive equilibrium ensures Pareto efficiency ✅
    (C) Monopoly markets are optimal
    (D) Equity is automatically achieved

    Explanation:
    Competitive markets allocate resources efficiently, though they may not ensure fairness.

    12. Pareto efficiency and market equilibrium coincide when:

    (A) Market is imperfect
    (B) Externalities exist
    (C) Perfect competition prevails ✅
    (D) Income is unequally distributed

    Explanation:
    Only under perfect competition does market equilibrium ensure Pareto optimality.

    13. Which of the following is an assumption of both Welfare Theorems?

    (A) Non-convex preferences
    (B) Perfect competition ✅
    (C) Increasing returns to scale
    (D) Price rigidity

    Explanation:
    Both rely on perfect competition and convex preferences for efficiency.

    14. The First Theorem of Welfare Economics links:

    (A) Monopoly and fairness
    (B) Competitive equilibrium and efficiency ✅
    (C) Income distribution and taxation
    (D) Growth and equity

    Explanation:
    It establishes that competitive market equilibrium results in a Pareto efficient allocation of resources.

    15. The Second Theorem links:

    (A) Redistribution and market equilibrium ✅
    (B) Taxes and inefficiency
    (C) Monopoly and price control
    (D) Production and inflation

    Explanation:
    It demonstrates that redistribution of endowments can achieve any desired Pareto efficient point through markets.

    16. The difference between the two theorems is that:

    (A) The first is normative, the second positive
    (B) The first is positive, the second normative ✅
    (C) Both are purely descriptive
    (D) Both are moral rules

    Explanation:
    The first describes (positive) how markets work; the second prescribes (normative) how redistribution can achieve fairness.

    17. A limitation of the Second Welfare Theorem is that:

    (A) It assumes lump-sum transfers are possible ✅
    (B) It ignores competition
    (C) It requires monopolies
    (D) It forbids redistribution

    Explanation:
    The theorem assumes costless, distortion-free lump-sum transfers, which are unrealistic in practice.

    Part C – The Social Welfare Function (SWF) (Q18–Q30)

    18. The Social Welfare Function (SWF) was introduced by:

    (A) Pareto
    (B) Pigou
    (C) Bergson ✅
    (D) Hicks

    Explanation:
    Abram Bergson (1938) formulated the concept; Samuelson later refined it for modern welfare analysis.

    19. The SWF expresses:

    (A) Economic growth
    (B) Aggregate income
    (C) Society’s welfare as a function of individual utilities ✅
    (D) Marginal productivity

    Explanation:
    It relates social welfare (W) to the utilities (U₁, U₂, …, Uₙ) of all individuals.

    W=f(U1,U2,U3,…,Un)

    20. The SWF allows:

    (A) No interpersonal utility comparison
    (B) Explicit interpersonal utility comparisons ✅
    (C) Only ordinal ranking
    (D) Only money measurement

    Explanation:
    Unlike Pareto, SWF explicitly uses ethical or value judgments to compare utilities between individuals.

    21. The SWF helps determine:

    (A) The most efficient but unequal allocation
    (B) The most preferred Pareto-efficient allocation ✅
    (C) The richest individual’s welfare
    (D) The producer’s surplus

    Explanation:
    Among many Pareto-efficient points, SWF selects the one that maximizes social welfare based on social values.

    22. The Benthamite (Utilitarian) SWF maximizes:

    (A) The welfare of the poorest
    (B) The sum of individual utilities ✅
    (C) The product of utilities
    (D) The minimum utility

    Explanation:
    The utilitarian approach adds up all individuals’ utilities:

    W=U1+U2+…+Un

    23. The Rawlsian (Max–Min) SWF focuses on:

    (A) The richest group
    (B) Average welfare
    (C) Welfare of the worst-off individual ✅
    (D) Total income

    Explanation:
    John Rawls emphasized justice and fairness — maximizing the welfare of the least advantaged person.

    24. The Bernoulli–Nash (Multiplicative) SWF:

    (A) Takes sum of utilities
    (B) Takes product of utilities ✅
    (C) Takes average utility
    (D) Uses cardinal measures

    Explanation:
    It represents social welfare as a product:

    W=U1×U2×…×Un

    ensuring balance between equality and efficiency.

    25. In the SWF diagram, the point of tangency between the Utility Possibility Frontier (UPF) and a Social Indifference Curve (SIC) shows:

    (A) Economic growth
    (B) Maximum social welfare ✅
    (C) Minimum social welfare
    (D) Perfect equality

    Explanation:
    The highest attainable social indifference curve tangent to the UPF identifies the welfare-maximizing allocation.

    26. The SWF includes:

    (A) Only individual utilities
    (B) Both individual utilities and social value judgments ✅
    (C) Only economic output
    (D) None of the above

    Explanation:
    It combines measurable individual welfare and ethical judgments about their relative importance.

    27. According to Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem:

    (A) A perfect social choice function cannot exist ✅
    (B) The SWF is always unique
    (C) Pareto efficiency ensures fairness
    (D) Redistribution reduces welfare

    Explanation:
    Kenneth Arrow proved that no voting system can aggregate individual preferences into a consistent social ranking satisfying all fairness conditions.

    28. Which of the following violates Arrow’s fairness conditions?

    (A) Dictatorship ✅
    (B) Non-comparability
    (C) Ordinality
    (D) Efficiency

    Explanation:
    Dictatorship violates the principle of collective decision-making, as one person’s preferences dominate all others.

    29. A limitation of the SWF is that:

    (A) It ignores equality
    (B) It requires interpersonal utility comparisons ✅
    (C) It cannot handle multiple goods
    (D) It is purely positive

    Explanation:
    The SWF depends on subjective judgments comparing utilities between individuals, which is ethically debatable.

    30. The relationship among the three welfare tools is best summarized as:

    (A) Welfare Theorems define efficiency; SWF adds equity ✅
    (B) SWF ensures market equilibrium
    (C) Welfare Theorems replace SWF
    (D) SWF and Theorems are independent

    Explanation:
    The First and Second Welfare Theorems define efficient outcomes, while the SWF introduces social value judgments to choose among them.

  • UGC NET Economics Unit 1-Welfare Economics: Fundamental Theorems and Social Welfare Function

    1. Introduction to Welfare Economics

    Welfare Economics is a branch of microeconomics that studies how the allocation of resources affects social welfare — the collective well-being of society.

    It tries to answer two essential questions:

    1. Efficiency Question:
      How can resources be allocated to achieve maximum total output or satisfaction?
      (→ Efficiency analysis)

    2. Equity Question:
      How should resources and welfare be distributed among individuals?
      (→ Distribution analysis)

    Thus, welfare economics aims to design and evaluate economic policies that lead to the most efficient and just allocation of resources.

    2. Objectives of Welfare Economics

    1. To identify conditions for Pareto efficiency.

    2. To analyze when market equilibrium is socially optimal.

    3. To propose ways to improve social welfare through redistribution.

    4. To develop a Social Welfare Function (SWF) to measure collective well-being.

    3. Approaches to Welfare Economics

    Approach Basis Key Economist Focus
    Cardinal Utility Approach Utility measurable in absolute terms Pigou Total utility of society
    Ordinal Utility / Pareto Criterion Utility comparable in rank only Pareto Efficiency, not distribution
    Compensation Principle Potential compensation (Kaldor–Hicks) Kaldor & Hicks Practical welfare improvement
    Social Welfare Function (SWF) Value judgments included Bergson & Samuelson Ethical & social welfare analysis

    4. The Two Fundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics

    These theorems link competitive market equilibrium and Pareto efficiency — forming the foundation of modern welfare economics.

    🧮 The First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics

    Statement:

    “Every competitive equilibrium is Pareto efficient.”

    Meaning:

    Under certain ideal conditions, free markets automatically lead to an efficient allocation of resources without any external intervention.

    If all agents act competitively and markets are complete, the equilibrium achieved is Pareto Optimal — no one can be made better off without hurting someone else.

    Assumptions:

    1. Perfect competition in all markets.

    2. Rational consumers and firms (utility and profit maximization).

    3. No externalities (production or consumption).

    4. Perfect information (all agents fully informed).

    5. Convex preferences and diminishing returns.

    6. Complete markets for all goods and factors.

    Implications:

    • Market mechanism ensures efficiency (allocative + productive).

    • Justifies laissez-faire policy (minimum government interference).

    • Explains why competitive markets are considered “efficient” systems.

    Limitations:

    1. Does not guarantee equity or fairness — an efficient allocation may still be highly unequal.

    2. Assumes ideal market conditions rarely found in reality.

    3. Ignores externalities, public goods, and asymmetric information.

    ⚖️ The Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics

    Statement:

    “Any Pareto efficient allocation can be achieved through competitive equilibrium, provided there is an appropriate redistribution of initial endowments.”

    Meaning:

    Equity and efficiency can be separated.
    👉 The government can redistribute wealth or resources (to ensure fairness) and then allow free markets to reach an efficient outcome.

    Assumptions:

    1. Convex preferences and continuous utility functions.

    2. Perfect competition in all markets.

    3. Possibility of lump-sum redistribution (without distorting incentives).

    4. No transaction costs or externalities.

    Implications:

    • Efficiency and equity can be achieved simultaneously.

    • Government’s role: redistribute income, not control prices.

    • Establishes a normative policy framework — government adjusts endowments, markets ensure efficiency.

    Graphical Explanation:

    • In an Edgeworth box, redistribution shifts the initial endowment point, leading to a new contract curveallocation.

    • Each new endowment point represents a different Pareto efficient outcome achievable through market exchange.

    Limitations:

    1. Lump-sum transfers are unrealistic (governments can’t perfectly redistribute).

    2. Assumes perfect competition and no distortions.

    3. Ignores transaction costs and political constraints.

    4. Focuses only on efficiency — does not specify which allocation is “best” socially.

    5. The Social Welfare Function (SWF)

    Concept Origin:

    Proposed by Abram Bergson (1938) and later refined by Paul A. Samuelson, the Social Welfare Function incorporates value judgments to evaluate alternative allocations.

    Definition:

    “The Social Welfare Function (SWF) represents the welfare of society as a function of the welfare (utility) of all individuals.”

    Formally:

    W=f(U1,U2,U3,…,Un)

    Where:

    • W = Social welfare

    • Ui = Utility of individual i

    • n = Number of individuals in society

    Assumptions:

    1. Society’s welfare depends on individual utilities.

    2. Interpersonal comparison of utilities is allowed (value judgment).

    3. Welfare is an increasing function of individual utilities.

    4. Government or planner defines ethical weights for individuals’ utilities.

    Interpretation:

    Each point in the Utility Possibility Frontier (UPF) represents efficient allocations (Pareto Optimal).
    The SWF identifies which point on the frontier maximizes overall social welfare.

    Graphical Explanation:

    • Utility Possibility Frontier (UPF): All Pareto-efficient combinations of utilities of individuals A and B.

    • Social Indifference Curves (SICs): Show combinations of UA and UB giving equal social welfare.

    • The tangency between UPF and the highest SIC gives maximum social welfare.

    Types of Social Welfare Functions

    Type Expression Basis / Focus
    Benthamite (Utilitarian) W=U1+U2+…+Un
    		 Maximizes total utility (sum of happiness).
    Rawlsian (Max–Min) W=min⁡(U1,U2,…,Un)
    		 Maximizes the welfare of the poorest.
    Bernoulli–Nash W=U1×U2×…×Un
    		 Product form – balanced fairness and efficiency.
    Egalitarian W=U1=U2=…=Un
    		 Perfect equality.

    Role of Value Judgments

    • Explicit value judgments are necessary to define social preferences (unlike Pareto).

    • The SWF is normative, reflecting society’s ethical priorities.

    • The choice of form (utilitarian, Rawlsian, etc.) determines the social goal — equality vs. efficiency trade-off.

    Limitations of SWF

    1. Interpersonal utility comparisons are subjective.

    2. Determining weights for individuals’ utilities is difficult.

    3. Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem (Kenneth Arrow, 1951) — no social choice rule can convert individual preferences into a consistent collective ranking satisfying fairness axioms.

    4. Ignores non-utility aspects like freedom, justice, or rights (as Amartya Sen emphasized).

    6. Relationship Between Welfare Theorems and SWF

    • First Theorem: Defines efficiency (Pareto optimality).

    • Second Theorem: Describes how to reach efficiency with equity through redistribution.

    • SWF: Selects the most desirable efficient allocation based on social value judgments.

    Hence:

    Efficiency (Theorems)+Ethics (SWF)=Complete Welfare Economics

    7. Key Differences

    Basis First Theorem Second Theorem Social Welfare Function
    Nature Positive (descriptive) Normative (redistributive) Normative (ethical)
    Focus Efficiency of markets Redistribution for equity Overall social welfare
    Role of Government None Redistribute endowments Decide value weights
    Utility Comparison Not needed Not needed Needed
    Main Concept Pareto Efficiency Feasible redistribution Social choice with ethics

    8. Importance in Policy Making

    1. Justifies market mechanism for efficiency (Theorem I).

    2. Justifies redistribution policies for equity (Theorem II).

    3. Provides analytical foundation for welfare states.

    4. SWF helps evaluate alternative policies on ethical and distributive grounds.

    9. Key Terms Summary

    Term Meaning
    Pareto Efficiency No one can be better off without making another worse off.
    Utility Possibility Frontier (UPF) All possible Pareto-efficient utility combinations.
    Social Indifference Curve (SIC) All combinations of utilities giving same social welfare.
    Bergson–Samuelson SWF Function that ranks all possible social states based on ethical values.
    Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem No voting system can perfectly aggregate individual preferences into a social choice.

    10. Summary

    Concept Essence Policy Implication
    First Welfare Theorem Competitive equilibrium is Pareto efficient Free markets yield efficiency
    Second Welfare Theorem Any Pareto efficient outcome can be achieved with redistribution State can achieve equity + efficiency
    SWF Evaluates ethical desirability among Pareto efficient outcomes Government sets welfare goals

    📖 11. Suggested Readings

    1. A.P. Lerner – Economics of Control

    2. D.N. Dwivedi – Microeconomics: Theory and Applications

    3. Paul A. Samuelson – Foundations of Economic Analysis

    4. Koutsoyiannis – Modern Microeconomics

    5. Amartya Sen – Collective Choice and Social Welfare

    6. Hal R. Varian – Intermediate Microeconomics