SECTION A: SCHOOLS OF ACTING — WESTERN & EASTERN

1. Early Western Traditions

Greek Theatre

• Origins: Rooted in religious rituals dedicated to Dionysus.

• Acting Style: Highly stylized, declamatory, and ritualistic.

• Use of Masks: Large masks for amplification and character distinction.

• Chorus Function: Commented on action, representing collective moral/social consciousness.

• Training: Emphasis on voice projection, gesture, and rhetorical expression.

Roman Theatre

• Adapted Greek models but focused on entertainment and spectacle.

• Acting: More realistic in body movement; vocal projection was crucial in large amphitheatres.

• Mime and Pantomime: Popular forms; relied on physical acting and expressive gesture.

Elizabethan Theatre (16th–17th Century)

• Context: Flourished during Shakespeare’s era; no formal actor training schools yet.

• Acting Style: Rhetorical and dynamic; actors performed multiple roles, used heightened speech and direct audience address.

• Stage: Thrust stage allowed intimate connection with the audience.

• Costume and Gesture: Symbolic rather than realistic.

Commedia dell’Arte (Italy, 16th Century)

• Improvisational theatre with stock characters (Arlecchino, Pantalone, Colombina).

• Acting Method: Physical comedy, exaggerated gestures, acrobatics, and masks.

• Importance: Laid foundations for improvisation, ensemble work, and character archetypes in modern theatre.

---

2. Modern Western Schools of Acting

Representational Acting

• Focus: Illusion of real life; psychological truth and natural behaviour.

• Method: Actors “become” the character internally (as opposed to presentational acting).

• Influence: Central to modern realism.

Constantin Stanislavsky (1863–1938)

• Founder of the Stanislavsky System or “Method Acting.”

• Core Concepts:

  • Given Circumstances: The world and situation of the play.

  • Magic If: Imaginative projection — “What would I do if I were in this situation?”

  • Objective/Super-objective: The goal that drives the character’s actions.

  • Emotional Memory: Recall of personal experiences to evoke emotion.

  • Through-line of Action: Logical progression of objectives through the play.

• Impact: Foundation of naturalistic and method acting worldwide.

Vsevolod Meyerhold (1874–1940) — Biomechanics

• Reaction against Stanislavsky’s psychological realism.

• Advocated physical theatre: actor’s body as a precise instrument of expression.

• Developed biomechanics: system of movement emphasizing rhythm, balance, energy, and expressiveness.

• Promoted theatricality and stylisation.

Bertolt Brecht (1898–1956) — Epic Theatre

• Objective: To provoke critical awareness, not emotional catharsis.

• Acting Principle: Verfremdungseffekt (Alienation Effect) — the actor presents the character rather than becoming it.

• Techniques: Narration, placards, songs, direct address to audience, visible stage mechanics.

• Aim: Encourage audiences to question social and political realities.

Jerzy Grotowski (1933–1999) — Poor Theatre

• Concept: Eliminate excess (set, costume, lighting) to focus on the actor-spectator encounter.

• Actor Training: Intense physical and vocal discipline, precision, and authenticity.

• Goal: “Total act” — actor’s spiritual and physical self-exposure to audience.

• Legacy: Physical theatre and experimental training worldwide.

---

3.

EASTERN SCHOOLS OF ACTING

Eastern performance traditions are among the oldest and most sophisticated acting systems in the world.
Unlike the Western emphasis on individual psychology and realism, the Eastern schools prioritize codified gesture, stylization, symbolic expression, spiritual discipline, and collective harmony between performer, music, movement, and audience.
They approach acting not merely as imitation of life, but as a ritual art form that elevates emotion into aesthetic and spiritual experience.

---

I. Sanskrit Theatre (India)

Origin and Philosophy

• The Natyashastra, attributed to Bharata Muni (circa 2nd century BCE–2nd century CE), is the foundational text of Indian dramaturgy and actor training.

• Acting (abhinaya) is a spiritual discipline, not just entertainment — its ultimate goal is the evocation of rasa(aesthetic relish or emotional essence).

• The actor’s task is to transmute worldly emotions (bhavas) into purified aesthetic experience (rasa).

Core Concepts of Acting

1. Abhinaya (Means of Expression) – the fourfold system:

   • Angika Abhinaya – bodily gestures, postures, and facial expressions.

   • Vachika Abhinaya – verbal expression, including speech, intonation, song, and rhythm.

   • Aharya Abhinaya – costume, makeup, ornaments, and scenography that support the mood.

   • Sattvika Abhinaya – inner or psychological expression manifesting in involuntary physical signs (e.g., tears, trembling, pallor).

2. Bhava and Rasa Relationship

   • Bhava (emotion expressed by the actor) is the cause,
     Rasa (aesthetic emotion experienced by the audience) is the effect.

   • Nava Rasas (nine emotions): Śṛṅgāra (love), Hāsya (laughter), Karuṇa (pathos), Raudra (anger), Vīra (heroism), Bhayānaka (fear), Bībhatsa (disgust), Adbhuta (wonder), Śānta (tranquility).

3. Training and Technique

   • Based on codification, rhythm, and precision.

   • Training in dance, gesture, voice modulation, and musicality.

   • Mastery over mudras (hand gestures), gati (movement), chari (steps), and sthāna (stance).

   • Acting as Yoga: The actor achieves balance between mind, body, and emotion through controlled discipline — similar to yogic meditation.

4. Performance Conventions

   • Non-realistic, symbolic presentation; minimal stage properties.

   • Suggestive (dhvani) rather than representational expression.

   • Actors project archetypal states rather than individual psychology.

   • Stylised movement, measured rhythm, and musical intonation unify speech and gesture.

5. Influence

   • Basis for classical Indian dance-drama traditions like Kathakali, Koodiyattam, Yakshagana, Ankia Nat and Ras Leela.

   • Modern Indian acting pedagogy (at NSD and universities) integrates abhinaya with Stanislavskian realism for holistic training.

---

II. Peking (Beijing) Opera – China

Historical Background

• Originated in the 18th century (Qing Dynasty) as a synthesis of older regional forms.

• Represents the culmination of Chinese theatrical aesthetics: music, mime, dance, and acrobatics unified into a highly stylised performance system.

Philosophy and Nature of Acting

• Acting is not imitation but symbolic representation (chengshi).

• The stage is a metaphoric space — a single chair or whip can represent mountains, horses, or cities.

• The actor must internalise both technical precision and moral refinement (ethics of performance known as de).

Training and Role Types

• Training begins in childhood; includes acrobatics, singing, martial arts, gesture, and dance.

• Four major role categories (hangdan):

  1. Sheng – male roles (scholars, warriors, old men).

  2. Dan – female roles (played by men historically).

  3. Jing – painted-face roles (symbolic facial makeup for generals, gods, demons).

  4. Chou – comic or clown characters, often commentators.

• Each role type has unique voice timbre, walk, rhythm, and gesture vocabulary.

Vocal and Physical Technique

• Integration of song (chang), speech (nian), dance-acting (zuo), and combat (da).

• Actors use high-pitched falsetto, musical speech, and rhythmic pacing.

• Costumes and Makeup: Iconographic and codified—colors convey moral attributes (red = loyalty, white = deceit, black = integrity).

Acting Principles

• Precision and Restraint: No improvisation; perfection achieved through repetition.

• Symbolism: Movement and color evoke abstract qualities (virtue, emotion, status).

• Unity of the Arts: The actor is singer, dancer, mime, and acrobat.

Influence

• Inspired Western avant-garde directors (e.g., Brecht studied Chinese acting for Epic Theatre’s “gestic” style).

• Basis for physical and visual discipline in intercultural actor training.

---

III. Noh Theatre – Japan

Origins

• Developed in the 14th century by Kan’ami and Zeami Motokiyo.

• Merges Buddhist philosophy, Shinto ritual, and courtly aesthetics.

• Conceived as “the art of yūgen” — grace, profundity, and spiritual beauty expressed through restraint.

Philosophy of Acting

• Purpose: Not to imitate life but to embody the essence of emotion and transience (mono no aware).

• Acting is a spiritual path — a disciplined mastery over body, breath, and mind.

• The actor’s performance is a meditation in motion, guided by rhythm and stillness.

Performance Characteristics

• Minimalism: Bare wooden stage, single pine-tree backdrop (kagami-ita).

• Movement: Slow, precise, codified; emotion is expressed through tempo, rhythm, and posture rather than facial expression.

• Masks: Represent archetypal roles (women, ghosts, deities, warriors); slight head tilt alters emotional tone.

• Chorus & Music: Recitation and drum ensemble (hayashi) accompany the actor.

• Role Types:

  • Shite (principal actor)

  • Waki (secondary, often a priest or traveller)

  • Kyōgen (comic interlude performer)

Training

• Begins in childhood; physical repetition until movement becomes subconscious.

• Focus on kata (forms), ma (interval/silence), and jo-ha-kyū (rhythmic progression: introduction, development, rapid conclusion).

Acting Ideal

• The actor must “empty the self” to become a vessel for the character’s spirit.

• Performance achieves transcendence when technique and feeling are unified in absolute control — the opposite of Western spontaneity.

Influence

• Noh deeply influenced Western modernists (Yeats, Beckett, Brook) who admired its austerity and ritual power.

• Introduced the concept of economy and inner stillness in actor training worldwide.

---

IV. Kabuki Theatre – Japan

Origins and Nature

• Originated in the early 17th century (Edo Period) by female performer Okuni, later performed by men.

• Derived from the word kabuku meaning “to lean or deviate” — symbolizing flamboyance and stylized expression.

• Kabuki is actor-centred, spectacular, and dynamic — a fusion of dance, music, mime, and melodrama.

Aesthetic Principles

• Mie: The actor freezes in an exaggerated pose at climactic moments — concentrates the energy of emotion and power.

• Aragoto (“rough style”): Heroic, exaggerated acting for warrior roles.

• Wagoto (“soft style”): Gentle and realistic acting for romantic or domestic roles.

• Onnagata: Male actors specializing in female roles — epitome of stylisation and grace.

Training

• Traditional apprenticeship; actors inherit roles through lineage.

• Training emphasizes dance, music, gesture precision, and stamina.

• Use of kata (codified patterns) similar to Noh and Sanskrit forms.

Stagecraft

• Hanamichi (runway) connects stage and audience for dynamic entrances.

• Rotating stages, trapdoors, and elaborate costumes enhance visual drama.

• Music (nagauta) and percussion cue action and emotion.

Acting Technique

• Mix of realistic dialogue and symbolic gesture.

• Actor projects energy outward; performance is demonstrative, not internalized.

• Voice is modulated rhythmically, accompanied by movement and stylized breath control.

Philosophy

• Kabuki acting expresses kata (form) rather than psychological realism — external perfection evokes inner essence.

• It celebrates artifice — the beauty of theatrical illusion rather than natural imitation.

Influence

• Inspired 20th-century directors like Peter Brook and Eugenio Barba in exploring non-realistic performance.

• Its principles of physical stylization, tempo, and visual rhythm are incorporated in intercultural training methods.

---

V. Comparative Synthesis: Eastern vs Western Acting

---

VI. Influence on Modern and Indian Acting

• Indian actors and directors like Ratan Thiyam, Kavalam Panicker, and K.N. Panikkar drew from these Eastern disciplines, combining Natyashastra, Noh, and Grotowski methods to form hybrid performance languages.

• The National School of Drama (NSD) integrated Eastern physical training (yoga, Koodiyattam, Kalaripayattu) with Western systems (Stanislavsky, Brecht).

• The “Theatre of Roots” movement in India sought to reinterpret ancient abhinaya techniques through modern dramaturgy, bridging the gap between realism and ritual.

---

4. Elements of Actor’s Training

Mime

• Acting without words; conveys emotion and story through gesture and movement.

• Develops clarity, control, and expressiveness.

Voice and Speech

• Foundation of acting: control of breathing, resonance, diction, and tone.

• Essential for emotional colouring and text delivery.

Improvisation

• Enhances spontaneity, listening, collaboration, and adaptability.

• Rooted in Commedia dell’Arte and widely used in actor training and devised theatre.

Physical Theatre

• Integration of body, movement, sound, and space as primary expressive tools.

• Derived from Grotowski, Meyerhold, Lecoq traditions.

---

Direction Theories in Theatre and Drama

(With sections on Lighting and Costume Design)

---

1. The Concept of Direction

The director is the creative head and interpretive leader of a theatrical production — responsible for transforming a written script into a living performance.
In modern theatre, the director’s role has evolved from “stage manager” to “auteur” (creative author) — a visionary who unifies acting, design, rhythm, and meaning into a coherent stage experience.

Direction is both artistic (conceptual, aesthetic) and technical (management, coordination, composition).

---

2. Historical Evolution of Theories of Direction

(a) Early Period — The Playwright as Director

• In Greek, Sanskrit, and Elizabethan theatre, playwrights often directed their own plays (e.g., Sophocles, Kalidasa, Shakespeare).

• Acting and staging conventions were communal rather than personalized visions.

• No specialized “director” existed — the focus was ritual or text.

(b) The Birth of the Modern Director (19th Century)

• Emerged with the rise of realism and complex stagecraft.

• Theatre demanded unified vision — historically accurate sets, ensemble discipline, and consistent style.

The Duke of Saxe-Meiningen (1826–1914)

• Father of Modern Direction.

• Insisted on historical accuracy in costumes/props.

• Developed ensemble acting — all actors equally rehearsed and coordinated.

• Introduced the director as a visual composer, orchestrating actors and design as one artwork.

André Antoine (1858–1943) – Théâtre Libre, France

• Founder of Naturalistic Theatre.

• Emphasized realistic environment, “fourth wall” illusion, everyday speech.

• Introduced motivated lighting (real light sources like lamps, windows).

• Actor’s behaviour stems from environment — “truth of the stage equals truth of life.”

---

(c) Realist and Psychological Theories

Constantin Stanislavsky (Russia)

• Focused on psychological realism.

• Director’s role: guide actors to discover inner truth, given circumstances, and through-line of action.

• Rehearsal is a process of exploration, not imitation.

• Introduced the director as a teacher and collaborator — not authoritarian.

Elia Kazan (USA)

• Applied Stanislavskian method to American plays (Miller, Williams).

• Prioritized emotional authenticity, ensemble interplay, and social realism.

• Rehearsal as “laboratory for living truth.”

---

(d) Modernist and Non-Realistic Theories

Vsevolod Meyerhold – Constructivism and Biomechanics

• Director as architect of performance.

• Rejected naturalism; emphasized rhythmic composition, mechanical precision, and symbolic setting.

• Scenery built as dynamic “machines” actors could climb and use — theatre as kinetic sculpture.

Bertolt Brecht – Epic Theatre

• Director’s job: prevent audience’s emotional identification; provoke critical distance (Verfremdungseffekt).

• Used projections, songs, narration, and commentary.

• Acting was demonstration of behaviour, not illusion.

• Director as political educator, shaping awareness of social contradictions.

Jerzy Grotowski – Poor Theatre

• Director eliminates excess; focuses on actor–spectator relationship.

• Rehearsal as spiritual and physical training.

• Performance = ritual encounter; direction as orchestration of actor energy and spatial intimacy.

Peter Brook – The Empty Space

• Defined four kinds of theatre: Deadly, Holy, Rough, Immediate.

• Direction seeks “pure communication” — can happen anywhere if actor and audience truly connect.

• Director as catalyst, not dictator.

• Emphasized improvisation, multiculturalism, and spatial fluidity.

Augusto Boal – Theatre of the Oppressed

• Direction becomes facilitation — empowers participants to act out social change.

• Forum Theatre and Invisible Theatre dissolve director/actor hierarchy.

• Theatre as a tool for liberation rather than spectacle.

---

(e) Contemporary and Postmodern Theories

• Director as deviser — collaborator creating work through workshops (collective creation).

• Postdramatic Theatre (Lehmann): direction focuses on image, rhythm, sound, and movement, not linear narrative.

• Intercultural Directors (Ratan Thiyam, Kavalam Panicker, Tadashi Suzuki): blend ritual, physical training, and modern dramaturgy.

• Feminist and Applied Theatre Directors: reimagine direction as process, participation, and dialogue.

---

3. The Role and Responsibilities of the Director

Director as Collaborator: The director mediates between playwright, performers, and designers, ensuring coherence of mood, pace, and meaning.

---

4. Fundamentals of Directional Design

1. Balance

• Equilibrium between visual elements on stage.

• Prevents visual clutter or asymmetry; ensures focus.

2. Emphasis

• Highlighting focal points through lighting, movement, or spatial placement.

• Draws attention to the main dramatic moment.

3. Composition

• Arranging actors and set elements to create visual harmony.

• Reflects relationships and power dynamics (e.g., triangular composition for tension).

4. Picturisation

• Creating living pictures (tableaux vivants).

• Used to convey transitions, emotional peaks, or symbolic meaning.

5. Movement

• Directs energy flow; defines rhythm and dramatic progression.

• Can be realistic (daily motion) or stylised (choreographed pattern).

6. Tempo and Rhythm

• Tempo = pace of action; Rhythm = emotional pulse.

• The director manipulates both to sustain dramatic tension.

---

5. Process of Production (Script → Performance)

1. Script Analysis: Study structure, subtext, conflict, and character arcs.

2. Research & Conceptualisation: Historical, social, and thematic exploration.

3. Design Collaboration: Visualise set, light, costume, and sound within concept.

4. Casting: Choose actors fitting style, physicality, and energy.

5. Rehearsal Phase: Table reading → blocking → improvisation → run-throughs.

6. Technical Rehearsals: Integration of cues, light, and sound.

7. Preview & Performance: Audience interaction and adjustments.

8. Evaluation & Documentation: Review and refine for future performances.

---

💡 Lighting Design in Theatre

Lighting transforms space, mood, and focus — it is the director’s brush of atmosphere.

---

1. Functions of Lighting

1. Visibility – Ensures actors and set are seen clearly.

2. Focus – Directs audience attention to important actions or characters.

3. Mood and Atmosphere – Warm vs cool tones, brightness, and shadow shape emotional tone.

4. Time and Place – Suggests time of day, season, or interior/exterior environment.

5. Composition and Depth – Enhances visual balance and three-dimensionality.

6. Style – Reflects realism, expressionism, or abstraction as per production’s aesthetic.

---

2. Elements and Principles of Lighting

---

3. Types of Stage Lights

• Fresnel – Soft-edged, general wash.

• Profile/ERS – Hard-edged, focusable beam.

• PAR Can – Intense beam for strong highlights.

• Floodlight – Wide, even area light.

• Follow Spot – Tracks actor movement dynamically.

• LEDs & Intelligent Lights – Colour change and programmable movement.

---

4. The Lighting Designer’s Process

1. Script reading and concept alignment with director.

2. Creating lighting plot (diagram of instrument placement).

3. Programming cues in lighting console.

4. Cue-to-cue rehearsals for precision timing.

5. Balancing artistic expression with practical visibility.

---

👗 Costume Design in Theatre

Costume design is the visual psychology of character — it conveys personality, period, class, and emotion through fabric, colour, and silhouette.

---

1. Functions of Costume

1. Characterization – Defines age, profession, gender, social status, temperament.

2. Period & Style – Indicates historical era or aesthetic world of play.

3. Mood & Symbolism – Colours and textures evoke emotional and thematic associations.

4. Visual Unity – Complements lighting, set, and overall palette.

5. Practicality – Allows actor mobility, quick changes, and durability.

6. Transformation – Symbolic costume shifts can suggest time, identity, or psychological change.

---

2. Elements of Costume Design

---

3. The Costume Designer’s Process

1. Script Study & Character Analysis – Understanding journey and function of each role.

2. Historical/Stylistic Research – Authenticity or creative stylization as per concept.

3. Sketches & Mood Boards – Colour swatches, fabric samples.

4. Measurements & Fittings – Collaboration with actors and costume cutters.

5. Rehearsal Tests – Ensuring movement comfort and visual harmony.

6. Final Adjustments – Integration with lighting (colours change under stage light).

---

4. Relationship Between Direction, Lighting, and Costume

• All three must serve the director’s concept and reinforce the production’s mood and message.

• Lighting reveals costume; costume reflects light — their design must be coordinated for colour harmony and visibility.

• Director + Designers Collaboration:

  • Early production meetings set tone, palette, and texture.

  • Visual unity ensures audience perceives a single coherent world.

  • For stylised productions (Brecht, Grotowski, Tanvir), costume and light often symbolize class or emotion rather than literal accuracy.

    Summary Table

    Aspect	Core Purpose	Representative Theorists/Practitioners
    Direction	Unifying script, performance, and design under a coherent vision	Saxe-Meiningen, Antoine, Stanislavsky, Brecht, Brook, Boal
    Lighting	Define visibility, focus, mood, time, and style	Adolphe Appia, Gordon Craig, Tapas Sen (India)
    Costume	Support characterization, period, and symbolic aesthetics	Edith Head (West), Bhanu Athaiya (India), traditional folk designers
    Integrated Approach	Fusion of all design elements guided by directorial concept	NSD, Prithvi Theatre, Chorus Repertory (India)

---

🕯️ Indian Context: Direction, Lighting, and Costume

• Ebrahim Alkazi brought modern stagecraft to India — introduced sophisticated lighting design, realistic blocking, and ensemble training at NSD.

• Habib Tanvir used minimalist lights and folk-inspired costumes to merge local authenticity with modern political theatre.

• Ratan Thiyam (Manipur) integrates ritualistic white costumes and symbolic lighting inspired by spiritual traditions.

• B.V. Karanth and Kavalam Panicker fused music, costume, and light into rhythmic total theatre.

• Modern Indian Designers (Tapas Sen, Shailesh Shrivastava) revolutionized stage lighting aesthetics using colour theory and poetic visuality.

---

SECTION C: IDEAS ON PRODUCTION

1. Realistic Production

Essence: Faithfulness to life, psychological motivation, environmental realism.
Impact on India: Influenced post-Independence Indian realism (Mohan Rakesh, Vijay Tendulkar, Girish Karnad’s early plays) and institutionalised acting methods at NSD.

---

2. Non-Realistic Production

Essence: Breaking illusion, using theatre as instrument of reflection, change, and experimentation.
Impact on India: Inspired Badal Sircar’s Third Theatre, Habib Tanvir’s folk-realistic style, and Forum Theatre practices in activism and education.

---

IMPACT OF WESTERN ACTING & DIRECTION ON POST-INDEPENDENT INDIAN THEATRE

• Hybrid Aesthetics: Indian directors combined Stanislavskian realism with Brechtian social awareness and folk storytelling (e.g., Ratan Thiyam, Ebrahim Alkazi, Habib Tanvir).

• Training Pedagogies: NSD incorporated Stanislavsky and Grotowski methods in actor training.

• Devised/Community Theatre: Inspired by Boal’s participatory models and Brecht’s political theatre.

• Actor’s Craft: Indian performers employ both psychological depth and physical/ritual precision inherited from classical traditions.

---

KEY TERMINOLOGY FOR EXAM REVISION